2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010701)44:3<210::aid-cyto1113>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of five clustering algorithms to classify phytoplankton from flow cytometry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of methods have been suggested for the use in flow cytometry (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Most methods rely on estimate of number of populations leaving behind hierarchical nature of complex biological sample or use the hierarchy of clusters only as a proxy for building models of estimated number of components/clusters (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of methods have been suggested for the use in flow cytometry (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Most methods rely on estimate of number of populations leaving behind hierarchical nature of complex biological sample or use the hierarchy of clusters only as a proxy for building models of estimated number of components/clusters (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative analytical methods have been tested for flow cytometry data (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), but most of them rely on prior knowledge of the number of clusters (cell populations) expected in the sample. These methods produce limited number of clusters without information on their inner hierarchy (subpopulations).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By allowing data points to be associated to some degree with all clusters, not just the closest, the algorithm can be made more robust to the problem of local minima. Several extensions of this "fuzzy" version of the k-means algorithm, incorporating cluster shape information via scatter matrices (77), have recently been tried on a flow cytometric data set with some success (78). However, the value of k, the number of clusters, must be specified beforehand, and it would be preferable if the "natural" number of clusters could be determined automatically from the data.…”
Section: Non-neural Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demers et al 12 have proposed an extension of K-means to allow for nonspherical clusters, but this algorithm has been shown to have poorer performance than fuzzy K-means clustering. 13 Although the fuzzy K-means 14 takes into consideration some form of classification uncertainty, it is a heuristic-based algorithm that lacks a formal statistical foundation. Nima et al 15 have proposed a method of rapid cell population identification based on K-means that uses a change point detection algorithm to determine the number of sub-populations, which thus enables the method to be effective with nonspherical and concave distribution cell populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%