2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of finite element models of natural hip joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the adoption of a two-dimensional finite element model is used in the current study. Cilingir et al [33] explain that the results of computational simulation results between two-dimensional and three-dimensional are relatively similar. In addition, the influence of synovial fluid and surface roughness during contact is represented by the coefficient of friction, referred to in previous work by Uddin and Zhang [30].…”
Section: Giat Cyclementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the adoption of a two-dimensional finite element model is used in the current study. Cilingir et al [33] explain that the results of computational simulation results between two-dimensional and three-dimensional are relatively similar. In addition, the influence of synovial fluid and surface roughness during contact is represented by the coefficient of friction, referred to in previous work by Uddin and Zhang [30].…”
Section: Giat Cyclementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Material assumption for all simulated ceramic materials is set to be homogeneous, isotropic, and linear elastic, with a consideration for their Young modulus and Poisson ratio regarding their mechanical properties. The assumptions refer to previous studies conducted by Uddin and Zhang [30], Jagatia and Jin [31], Shankar [32], and Cilingir et al [33].…”
Section: Size (Mm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biomechanical and tribological properties of articular cartilage has been investigated over the past 20 years in-vitro through pin-on-plate or sphere-on-disk (Lipshitz et BI., 1975;Zimmerman et BI., 1988;Forster et BI., 1995;Forster and Fisher, 1996;Pickard et BI., 1998a;Pickard et BI., 1998b;Forster and Fisher, 1999;Freeman et BI., 2000;Basalo et al, 2004; Krishnan McCann et al, 2009), in hip (Muller et al, 2004Demarteau et al, 2006), in modelling studies (Boschetti et al, 2004;Cilingir et al, 2008). and in-vivo studies (Cook et al, 1982;Cruess et al, 1984;McGibbon et al, 1999;van der Meulen et al, 2002;Kyoung Ho et al, 2008).…”
Section: Cartilage Tribological Properties In a Plug Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of 3D anatomically based models was reported by Cilingir et al . who showed that anatomically based FE models produce significantly different stress distributions to simpler 2D and 3D axisymmetric models even though the contact force may be similar. The recent work of Anderson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%