2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of finite element and finite volume methods for simulation of natural ventilation in greenhouses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies of air flow, the experimental methods mostly used are scaled models and unidirectional anemometry; the tracer gas technique is used less often, as well as three-dimensional anemometry, which is considerably more expensive. Studies that have used new methods to assess ventilation systems, such as those by Lu (2009), Molina (2010), Endalew (2009), van Henten (2008, Mikulka (2010) and Defraeye (2010), have been increasing in the past three years. The main question is the validation of these studies because they mainly concern to real scale greenhouses, whereas the measurements and characterizations have merely been done on scale models.…”
Section: Main Results Of Cfd Models In Greenhousesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies of air flow, the experimental methods mostly used are scaled models and unidirectional anemometry; the tracer gas technique is used less often, as well as three-dimensional anemometry, which is considerably more expensive. Studies that have used new methods to assess ventilation systems, such as those by Lu (2009), Molina (2010), Endalew (2009), van Henten (2008, Mikulka (2010) and Defraeye (2010), have been increasing in the past three years. The main question is the validation of these studies because they mainly concern to real scale greenhouses, whereas the measurements and characterizations have merely been done on scale models.…”
Section: Main Results Of Cfd Models In Greenhousesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Molina et al (2010), on the effectiveness of the Finite Element Method (FEM) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) for two-dimensional incompressible turbulent flow in ventilation rates, it was found that the FEM requires twice the computation time and 10 times more memory storage than FVM. FVM software (ANSYS/FLUENT v 6.3.)…”
Section: Finite Element Vs Finite Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suhu tersebut cukup tinggi akibat adanya pengaruh radiasi matahari, yaitu sebesar i = 182 Wm -2 . Beberapa asumsi yang menjadi batasan dalam simulasi ini meliputi: 1) fenomena aliran pindah panas terjadi pada kondisi steady state, 2) tipe analisisnya eksternal, 3) sumber panas hanya berasal dari paparan radiasi matahari, 4) panas jenis, konduktifitas dan viskositas udara maupun air tetap konstan selama simulasi, 5) konduktifitas panas berupa isotropis, 6) fluida yang terlibat terdiri Boulard, Roy, & Valera, 2010). Secara umum, persamaan dasar dalam CFD terdiri dari hukum kekekalan massa, momentum dan energi (Boulard, Fatnassi, Majdoubi, & Bouirden, 2008;Sobachkin & Dumnov, 2013), dan pendekatan numerik untuk merepresentasikan prinsip kontinuitas massa dengan asumsi kondisi aliran yang steady dinyatakan dalam persamaan ReynoldAverage of the Navier-Stokes (Benjamin & Roberts, 2007;Della Torre, Montenegro, Tabor, & Wears, 2014;Halder & Datta, 2012) yang dituliskan dengan persamaan berikut:…”
Section: Simulasi Cfdunclassified
“…ANSYS is used for creating the volume mesh and the whole computational domain. Two simulation codes based on the finite element method (ANSYS/Mechanical) and the finite volume method (ANSYS/Fluent) were coupled to obtain numerical solutions for the integral equations which determine the airflow pressures, the wing eigenfrequencies, and its respective mode shapes [7,8]. Then, a numerical stochastic method of coupled fluid-structure model and reliability analysis based on the first and the second order reliability methods (FORM and SORM) is applied for analyzing the effect of uncertainties on the numerical results and to find the best compromise between cost and safety in order to supply guidelines for carrying out reliable and cost-effective projects, accounting for the statistical variability of the design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%