Comparison of filtration efficiency and respiratory resistance of COVID-19 protective masks by multi-national standards

Abstract

Background Face masks from worldwide satisfy different standards during the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to the public misunderstanding of the concepts. Methods We systematically evaluated the quality of face masks provided by different companies according to multi-national standards, including EN 149-2001+A1: 2009, GB 2626-2019 and NIOSH 42 CFR Part 84-2019, focusing particularly on the particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) and respiratory resistance performance. Results Three types of masks (planar, folding and cup type masks) were measured based on different standard protocols. The results indicated that the PFE of the mask decreased in sequence of folding mask ≈ cup type mask > planar mask. The respiratory resistance of the masks ranked as follows: cup type mask > folding mask> planar mask. Overall, when PFE was used as the quality indicator, all the masks have a higher chance of meeting criteria of the EN149-2001+A1:2009, followed by the stricter standard set by the GB2626-2019 and NIOSH 42 CFR Part84-2019. Conversely, the respiratory resistance of the masks fulfilled the highest requirement of the EN149-2001+A1:2009 standard, while it is easier to satisfied the standard of GB 2626-2019 and NIOSH 42 CFR Part 84-2019. Conclusions We believe that our study provides effective guidance for customers worldwide to choose proper face masks under different epidemic situations.

Microfluidic Spinning of Metal–Organic Framework-Loaded Nanofibers toward High-Efficient Particulate Matter Removal and Antibacterial Filters

“…According to national standards, the filter layer of medical surgical masks should be around 0.025−0.05 mm. 35,36 As shown in Figure S3, the thickness of the prepared filter layer is around 30−40 μm, which is in line with the standard of melt-blown cloth for medical surgical masks. The TGA curves in Figure S4 show that these fiber membranes have high thermal stability and further verify the loading of ZIF-8@CCM nanoparticles.…”

Antibacterial/Antiviral Face Masks: Processing, Characteristics, Challenges, and Sustainability

“…To minimize breathing resistance, the face mask must be air-permeable without compromising its effectiveness as a particle filter. Breathing resistance is measured by inhalation and exhalation following EN 149:2009, and it is a standard criterion for evaluating respirators such as FFR, FFP1-3, N95, and KN95 (Wang et al, 2022). The assessment must begin with mask conditioning, specifically heating and cooling cycles at 70 °C that extend up to 24 h then -30 °C for another 24 h respectively, with at least 4 h of rest interval between the two phases.…”

The Impact of Wearing Different Face Masks on Vigorous Physical Exercise Performance and Perceived Exertion among COVID-19 Infected vs. Uninfected Female Students

“…Prior research suggests N95 respirators offer higher degrees of protection, resulting in fewer observed respiratory and influenza-like illnesses, compared to surgical options [12,13]. Currently, numerous different standards exist worldwide, delineating testing procedures for essential factors, including fluid resistance, breathability, bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE), particle filtration efficiency (PFE), and other parameters crucial for assessing the quality of face masks [14,15]. This underscores the significance of studying the effects of various masks, as an enduring and critical subject of research.…”