1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0947-3580(99)70155-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Filtering Methods for Reducing Residual Vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that if amplitudes of all the pulses are nonnegative, then respecting conditions (5), it must belong to the interval 0 ≤ Ai ≤ 1. With respect to those limitations, by solving the equations (2) we get for min(t n ) the solution describing positive ZV shaper whose design is often stated in matrix form [3], [5], [6], [7]:…”
Section: Proposal Of An Input Shaper In the Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that if amplitudes of all the pulses are nonnegative, then respecting conditions (5), it must belong to the interval 0 ≤ Ai ≤ 1. With respect to those limitations, by solving the equations (2) we get for min(t n ) the solution describing positive ZV shaper whose design is often stated in matrix form [3], [5], [6], [7]:…”
Section: Proposal Of An Input Shaper In the Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriately chosen shaper suppress residual vibrations of the system. Note that the suppression ratio of residual vibrations is often expressed as the ratio of the amplitude of the output signal with the shapers input signal to the amplitude of the output signal without the shaper [4], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15]. Comparisons between Input Shaping and conventional filtering methods have shown Input Shaping to be more successful in some studies, and conventional filtering to be more successful in other studies, as a result of improved filter tuning 16,17 . The current paper builds on the "dipole" disturbance rejection filter (DRF), which explicitly employs the disturbance vibration frequency into a filter embedded in the control loop.…”
Section: Figure 1 Naval Postgraduate School's Three-axis Simulator (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if an approximation of the system's natural frequency and damping parameters is available, ltering methods such as input shaping can help prevent the excitation of natural modes and reduce the vibrations. Advantages of input shaping methods over conventional lters, which are designed in frequency domain, are shown in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%