2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of filter media materials for heavy metal removal from urban stormwater runoff using biofiltration systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
35
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…low concentrations, they were still able to maintain high removal performance for the high concentration experiments [36]. In summary, the inflow heavy metal concentration had a relatively minor (not significant) influence on the removal efficiency of the four bioretention media mixes in study.…”
Section: Influent Heavy Metal Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…low concentrations, they were still able to maintain high removal performance for the high concentration experiments [36]. In summary, the inflow heavy metal concentration had a relatively minor (not significant) influence on the removal efficiency of the four bioretention media mixes in study.…”
Section: Influent Heavy Metal Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The removal efficiencies of the four heavy metals in reactors 3 and 4 had similar trends, i.e., regardless of inflow heavy metal concentration, the removal efficiencies of the four metals all exceeded 93.8%. These trends suggest that, while the media were already performing well at the low concentrations, they were still able to maintain high removal performance for the high concentration experiments [36]. In summary, the inflow heavy metal concentration had a relatively minor (not significant) influence on the removal efficiency of the four bioretention media mixes in study.…”
Section: Influent Heavy Metal Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Wong et al (2013) advocated the use of biofiltration systems with a submerged zone for urban stormwater treatment. The biofilters showed high removal efficiencies of TSS (N90%), pathogens (1-3 log for Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, and F-RNA coliphages), heavy metals (N 90% for Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb), PAHs (N 80%), oil and grease (N95%) and glyphosate (N80%) (Bratieres et al, 2008;Li et al, 2012;Lim et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2014). However, the biofilters were not effective in removing the triazine herbicides.…”
Section: Stormwater Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Lim et al [24] recommended using potting soil as the principal media mixed with compost or sludge by comparing the heavy metal removal potential (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) of five materialsbased (potting soil, compost, coconut coir, sludge, and a commercial mix) laboratory column experiments. Small column tests by Guo et al [25] were conducted on various soil mixes as a rapid evaluation tool for the optimum engineered soil mix, considering its ability to support healthy plant/tree growth, cost-effectiveness, availability in local markets, hydraulic conductivity, and its ease of preparation by local landscape contractors.…”
Section: Bio-swale Column Experiments and Simulation Of Hydrologic Immentioning
confidence: 99%