2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of field sampling methods for assessing coarse woody debris and use of airborne laser scanning as auxiliary information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis was tested by simulating the sampling of a reduced number of field reference plots for predicting V (cf. [52][53][54]), i.e., applying Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling for the selection of the first-stage sample units [79].…”
Section: Unsupervised Classification Of the Forested Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis was tested by simulating the sampling of a reduced number of field reference plots for predicting V (cf. [52][53][54]), i.e., applying Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling for the selection of the first-stage sample units [79].…”
Section: Unsupervised Classification Of the Forested Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This greater interest in tropical forests has been principally motivated by the need to improve the quantification of aboveground biomass as an important component of the global carbon cycle (Keller et al, 2001). Sampling and spatial variability of course woody debris (CWD)-an important structural component of forest ecosystems that has been recognized as one of the strongest indicators of forest biodiversity (Pesonen et al, 2009), has also received a fair amount of attention world-wide (e.g. Bate et al, 2004;Pesonen et al, 2009;Woldendorp et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The times taken to survey the plots were estimated from the actual measurement times recorded during the fieldwork (for details, see Pesonen et al, 2009), so that the measurement of one type of CWD material on a 400 m 2 plot was defined as taking on average 3.4 min, for example. The time needed for transition between plots was calculated as the average walking distance between the plots multiplied by an assumed walking speed in the forest of 2 km h À1 .…”
Section: Simulation and Comparison Of Sampling Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%