2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/demped.2017.8062379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of field oriented versus model predictive torque control techniques for monitoring interior PM traction motor over wide speed range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the control method, the popular control methods for PMSM are fieldoriented control (FOC) and direct torque control (DTC). They have their strengths, however, compared to the application of the MPC in EVs, their shortcomings are obvious-for instance, the FOC will require fine-tuning of parameters, and DTC does not have good efficiency performance [9]. Also, when comparing the hardware losses, such as the sampling frequency, flux, and torque ripple, the model predictive control (MPC) has significant strength compared to them both [10,11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the control method, the popular control methods for PMSM are fieldoriented control (FOC) and direct torque control (DTC). They have their strengths, however, compared to the application of the MPC in EVs, their shortcomings are obvious-for instance, the FOC will require fine-tuning of parameters, and DTC does not have good efficiency performance [9]. Also, when comparing the hardware losses, such as the sampling frequency, flux, and torque ripple, the model predictive control (MPC) has significant strength compared to them both [10,11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simulation model is required to investigate the peculiar dynamic properties, stability and controllability of the vehicle, as well as to verify, debug and pre-tune the algorithm of torque distribution over the driving axles of the vehicle [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al evaluated an improvement on the existing MPC system by comparing it with FOC, in both high-speed and low-speed conditions along, with its switching frequency evaluation [10]. Adamopoulos et al and Yang etal., compared, specifically, the dynamic characteristics of FOC and MPC for a PMSM [11,12]. However, when addressing EV applications such as speed matching, evaluating steady-state characteristics is equally important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%