2016
DOI: 10.1193/111515eqs170m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Field Data Processing Methods for the Evaluation of Topographic Effects

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of field data processing methods used to evaluate topographic effects. A data set of 52 weak motion events recorded using a dense array of seismometers located on steep, complex topography is analyzed. Both time domain and frequency domain analysis methods are evaluated for effectiveness at resolving the amplitude and frequency range associated with topographic effects. Results from this study indicate the median reference method (MRM) provides a more stable estimate of the fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, for complex conditions of topographic surface and buried morphology, the directional effects of the incoming waves may greatly influence the surface ground motion. Taking into account the limitations of the experimental approaches, mainly due to definition of the reference station (Wood and Cox 2016), some authors have highlighted unexpected substantial differences between experimental and numerical approaches in some topographically complex areas. These differences mainly regard the magnitude of the amplification function and the frequency range within which the topographic effects are greatest (Bard 1982; Bard and Tucker 1985;Geli et al 1988;Hartzell et al 1994;Assimaki et al 2005;Assimaki and Jeong 2013;Chávez-García et al 1996;Barani et al 2014;Sánchez-Sesma et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for complex conditions of topographic surface and buried morphology, the directional effects of the incoming waves may greatly influence the surface ground motion. Taking into account the limitations of the experimental approaches, mainly due to definition of the reference station (Wood and Cox 2016), some authors have highlighted unexpected substantial differences between experimental and numerical approaches in some topographically complex areas. These differences mainly regard the magnitude of the amplification function and the frequency range within which the topographic effects are greatest (Bard 1982; Bard and Tucker 1985;Geli et al 1988;Hartzell et al 1994;Assimaki et al 2005;Assimaki and Jeong 2013;Chávez-García et al 1996;Barani et al 2014;Sánchez-Sesma et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to ground motion recordings and earthquake damage reports from sites characterized by topography, it has long been known that topographic features are an indicator of site effects, but theoretical explanations based on the relief's geometrical characteristics usually underestimated the observed amplification values (Geli et al 1988). The discrepancies between predictions and observations can be ascribed to the absence of adequate reference site in many experimental estimates (Pedersen et al 1994;Wood and Cox 2016) on one hand, and on the other hand, to the adoption of oversimplified models in theoretical estimates. The oversimplification that may cause underestimation of theoretically predicted amplifications typically consists of inadequate two-dimensional (2D) approximation of prominently three-dimensional (3D) topographic features (Paolucci 2002;Luo et al 2020) or in neglecting impedance contrasts in the subsurface structure that possibly concur with topography in forming amplification effects (Graizer 2009;Assimaki and Jeong 2013;Hailemikael et al 2016, to cite a few).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are three kinds of methods to study the topographic site effects: experimental method (e.g., Tucker et al, 1984;Wood and Cox, 2016;Stolte et al, 2017), analytical and semi-analytical method (e.g., Yuan and Liao, 1996;Paolucci, 2002) and numerical simulation methods (e.g., Boore, 1972;Geli et al, 1988;Hartzell et al, 2017). The standard spectral ratio (SSR) method (Borcherdt, 1970) is the spectral ratio of ground motions between the target station and the adjacent reference station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%