2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-assisted Keratoplasty versus Conventional Penetrating Keratoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
52
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed advantages of FLAK over traditional PK include faster postoperative healing and stitch removal, less postoperative refractive error, and decreased likelihood of wound dehiscence because of the increased contact surface area between the graft and the host. [139][140][141] Similar results were reported by Busin with manual dissection of a top hat configuration. 142 Rush et al reviewed their 18-month postoperative results for FLAK with 8.5/8.6-mm diameter zigzag trephinations in 12 patients with a history of either globe trauma with cornea scarring or failed penetrating keratoplasty.…”
Section: Femtosecond Laser-assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty (Flak)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The proposed advantages of FLAK over traditional PK include faster postoperative healing and stitch removal, less postoperative refractive error, and decreased likelihood of wound dehiscence because of the increased contact surface area between the graft and the host. [139][140][141] Similar results were reported by Busin with manual dissection of a top hat configuration. 142 Rush et al reviewed their 18-month postoperative results for FLAK with 8.5/8.6-mm diameter zigzag trephinations in 12 patients with a history of either globe trauma with cornea scarring or failed penetrating keratoplasty.…”
Section: Femtosecond Laser-assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty (Flak)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…3 In addition, this approach enables early suture removal. 4,5 Furthermore, this approach allows for either the endothelial or epithelial surface of the cornea to be transplanted widely as needed depending on the underlying disease. Finally, FLAK has demonstrated less endothelial cell damage and superior wound healing results compared with that which occurs after manual trephination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamberlain et al studied postoperative astigmatism in a series of patients submitted to PK, comparing the manual technique with the FS laser-assisted procedure. (11) The latter provided better control of astigmatism in the early postoperative period. However, after 6 months of follow-up there was no significant difference in postoperative astigmatism between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%