1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90091-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of fatigue for three prefabricated threaded post systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue is considered as one of the main causes of structural failure in restorative dentistry [21][22][23][24] . It has been reported that dental restorations fail more frequently under cyclic loading tests that are well below the ultimate flexural strength of these materials, versus the application of a single, relatively higher, external force 25) . Fatigue tests can reveal the resistance level of each type of post under cyclic loading, which simulates the normal occlusal and masticatory function 16,26,27) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue is considered as one of the main causes of structural failure in restorative dentistry [21][22][23][24] . It has been reported that dental restorations fail more frequently under cyclic loading tests that are well below the ultimate flexural strength of these materials, versus the application of a single, relatively higher, external force 25) . Fatigue tests can reveal the resistance level of each type of post under cyclic loading, which simulates the normal occlusal and masticatory function 16,26,27) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como promedio es conveniente que el orificio para el poste sea de unos 2 mm de diámetro. Se puede mejorar la retención a expensas del diámetro del diente pero el riesgo de fractura aumenta notablemente (2,(5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A expansão do revestimento foi feita pela técnica convencional da expansão térmica, utilizando-se uma célula de carga número 2 (100Kg) e velocidade de 0,5mm/min (KAHN et al, 1994;MONDELLI et al, 1980). Os corpos-de-prova receberam uma força de compressão incidindo em ângulo de 135º com o longo eixo da raiz (ângulo de 45º em relação ao plano horizontal), simulando um contato oclusal do dente antagonista em classe I de Angle (Figura 11).…”
Section: Obtenção Da Porção Radicular E Coronária Do Núcleo Metálico unclassified