Comparison of family partnership intervention care vs. conventional care in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in a community hospital: A randomized controlled trial

Kang, Chun Mei; Chang, Shang‐Tzen; Chen, Ping Ling; Liu, Pei Fen; Liu, Wen Cheng; Chang, Chia Chi; Chang, Wen Yin

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.009

Cited by 62 publications

(126 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

121

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We found that DSME based individual program was conducted into 40.9% of the studies (12,13,16,20,23,25,29,30,32) and 59.1% of the studies offered the DSME in a combination of individual and group education (12,14,15,17,20,21,27,31,32,34) . In general, The individual or group-based program provided the intervention of several strategies, including personalized counseling, feedback regarding goal-setting and problem-solving, support for self-care practice from family members, and the follow-up session.…”

Section: Diabetes Mellitus Self-management Education (Dsme)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another study presented the cooking class to demonstrate the health food (20) . A study offered diabetes telemonitoring calls by using the mHealth + CarePartner (CP) to improve diabetes self-management and supporting their blood glucose monitoring (26) .…”

Section: Strategy Of Diabetes Self-management Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A bluetooth technology was incorporated to deliver the diabetes information (12) . Four studies used food model, picture, illustration, foot picture (14,18,20,24) . Diabetes handout/booklet (diet, exercise, medication, eye, and foot self-care) been used to spread the knowledge (15,16,19,21,30,32,36) .…”

Section: Education Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Diabetes handout/booklet (diet, exercise, medication, eye, and foot self-care) been used to spread the knowledge (15,16,19,21,30,32,36) . In addition, four studies (13,14,20,34) used video and DVD to show the successfully of self-care behaviors practice among diabetes patients. Another study used a mobile health (mHealth) to monitor the behaviors and update the diabetes information (26) …”

Section: Education Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies were noticed to follow-up the program by using the telephone method (13,14,25,26,32) . Mix of telephone and face-to-face follow-up strategies (18)(19)(20)29) and two studies did not mention about the follow-up process for evaluating the program (16,21) …”

Section: Follow-up Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review: Family Support Integrated To Diabetes Self-Management among Glycemic Uncontrolled Type II DM Patients

Pamungkas¹,

Chamroonsawasdi²,

Vatanasomcoon³

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Background: Diabetes mellitus is dramatically increasing in the wide world. The managing of diabetes care emphasized the self-management education and support into patients' care and family care.Objective: to review and synthesizes the effectiveness of DSME strategies involving family as a key person to provide social support for diabetes mellitus self-management of glycemic uncontrolled patients Method: Three databases through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were reviewed to assess the relevant articles. The following search terms: "type 2 diabetes," "self-management," "family support," and "glycemic uncontrolled." We summarized details of family support on self-management among glycemic uncontrolled patients for 14 existing studies.Results: A total of 22 intervention studies were identified. Those studies have a heterogeneous of the education strategies, support perceived, follow-ups strategies and outcomes among type 2 DM. Family integration on diabetes self-management education (DSME) has a positive impact on several outcomes including, self-care behaviors, psychological outcomes, self-efficacy and clinical outcomes Conclusions: This systematic review found robust data related to the integration of family support on diabetes self-management among glycemic uncontrolled patients. Consequently, the improvement in outcomes was identified. Implications:The findings suggest model of family engagement is better and needed for sustaining the diabetes care in the long-term care

show abstract

Section: Diabetes Mellitus Self-management Education (Dsme)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Strategy Of Diabetes Self-management Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Education Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Education Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Follow-up Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review: Family Support Integrated To Diabetes Self-Management among Glycemic Uncontrolled Type II DM Patients

Pamungkas¹,

Chamroonsawasdi²,

Vatanasomcoon³

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment, waiting list control or no intervention for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Steinsbekk

Rygg

Lisulo

et al. 2015

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Does family‐centred education improve treatment adherence, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood glucose level in patients with type 1 diabetes? A randomized clinical trial

Mansour

Maslakpak

2022

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To investigate the effect of family‐centred education on treatment adherence, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood glucose level in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Design Randomized controlled trial. Methods Sixty patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus were randomly allocated into the intervention and control group. Data were collected using demographic and Modanloo Adherence to Treatment Questionnaires. The patients received 12 family‐centred educational sessions in the intervention group. Results A significant difference was found in the mean score of treatment adherence between the two groups after the intervention (p < 0.001). The mean score of treatment adherence significantly increased in the intervention group after family‐centred education. The mean score of Fasting Blood Glucose and Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1C significantly decreased in the intervention group after the intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusion Relevant authorities need to consider family‐centred education as one of the most important education methods in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus patients. Trial registration IRCT20131112015390N4; August 21, 2020.

show abstract

Comparison of family partnership intervention care vs. conventional care in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in a community hospital: A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 62 publications

References 21 publications

A Systematic Review: Family Support Integrated To Diabetes Self-Management among Glycemic Uncontrolled Type II DM Patients

A Systematic Review: Family Support Integrated To Diabetes Self-Management among Glycemic Uncontrolled Type II DM Patients

Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment, waiting list control or no intervention for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Does family‐centred education improve treatment adherence, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood glucose level in patients with type 1 diabetes? A randomized clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About