2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.03.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of extra-anatomic bypass grafting with angioplasty for atherosclerotic disease of the supra-aortic trunks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While several case reports and case series describe experiences using one particular technique, only six studies to date have compared the results of a percutaneous endovascular technique to surgical subclavian artery revascularization [50][51][52][53][54][55]. These six studies were published between 1989 and 2012, and as a result compare various open surgical techniques (carotidsubclavian bypass, carotid-to-carotid bypass, subclavian-to-subclavian bypass, subclavian-to-axillary bypass, and subclavian carotid transposition) to different endovascular techniques (PTA alone, PTA with balloon-expandable stent, PTA with self-expanding stent) as technology advanced and for different indications prohibiting a meaningful meta-analysis.…”
Section: Percutaneous Endovascular Intervention Versus Surgical Revasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several case reports and case series describe experiences using one particular technique, only six studies to date have compared the results of a percutaneous endovascular technique to surgical subclavian artery revascularization [50][51][52][53][54][55]. These six studies were published between 1989 and 2012, and as a result compare various open surgical techniques (carotidsubclavian bypass, carotid-to-carotid bypass, subclavian-to-subclavian bypass, subclavian-to-axillary bypass, and subclavian carotid transposition) to different endovascular techniques (PTA alone, PTA with balloon-expandable stent, PTA with self-expanding stent) as technology advanced and for different indications prohibiting a meaningful meta-analysis.…”
Section: Percutaneous Endovascular Intervention Versus Surgical Revasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The use of cadaveric or prosthetic graft material has been described; however, the use of these tissue substitutes may be limited by infection with resultant graft occlusion or anastomotic aneurysm formation. 16,17 This has led to the recommendation for reconstruction with autologous or prosthetic material in a "clean" tissue plane remote to the area of radiation. This strategy optimizes graft coverage and wound healing with healthy, nonirradiated tissue and minimizes both infectious and hemorrhagic complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four recurrent stenoses were treated successfully by percutaneous angioplasty, and 4 required surgical revascularization. In a nonrandomized comparison of endovascular revascularization with extraanatomic bypass surgery for subclavian stenosis, all bypass grafts remained patent except 1 that occluded 19 years after operation (692). In contrast, 6 of 46 attempted subclavian artery angioplasties could not be completed because of occlusive lesions.…”
Section: Revascularization Of the Brachiocephalic And Subclavian Artementioning
confidence: 96%
“…No randomized trials have compared these methods with surgical revascularization, but numerous reports from single institutions have provided data about early and long-term results, and 2 reports compared results of catheter-based and surgical revascularization in patients with symptomatic obstructive subclavian artery disease (692,694,695). In a series of 110 patients reported in 2005, the procedure was considered initially successful in 93% of cases (694).…”
Section: Revascularization Of the Brachiocephalic And Subclavian Artementioning
confidence: 99%