1990
DOI: 10.1109/26.46540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of estimators for frequency offset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression for the mean square error when only N packets are received is shown in Appendix C to be 160.~x 4 E (2) = (vT) Wolf and Schwartz (1990) use the Cramer-Rao bound (see also Sorenson (1980)), to show that the best estimation of the frequency offset (or rate of the time offset) one can have yields a minimum mean square error of…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of the Fi"equency Offset Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression for the mean square error when only N packets are received is shown in Appendix C to be 160.~x 4 E (2) = (vT) Wolf and Schwartz (1990) use the Cramer-Rao bound (see also Sorenson (1980)), to show that the best estimation of the frequency offset (or rate of the time offset) one can have yields a minimum mean square error of…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of the Fi"equency Offset Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%