2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ESA climate change initiative land cover to CORINE land cover over Eastern Europe and the Baltic States from a regional climate modeling perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The categories included in the present analysis are rainfed, irrigated, and mosaic cropland and grassland (IDs 10, 11, 12, 20, 30, and 130), resulting in the mask shown in Figure S6. All of the used data sets have been extensively validated (e.g., [60,[67][68][69][70]); therefore, a validation was not conducted here.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories included in the present analysis are rainfed, irrigated, and mosaic cropland and grassland (IDs 10, 11, 12, 20, 30, and 130), resulting in the mask shown in Figure S6. All of the used data sets have been extensively validated (e.g., [60,[67][68][69][70]); therefore, a validation was not conducted here.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLC is considered as a reliable reference in terms of land-cover knowledge in Europe, achieving a thematic accuracy superior to 92% for CLC 2018 (86-98%, depending on the country [47] and a geometric accuracy of 100 m. Several complex classes show lower accuracies (e.g., Mine, dump and construction sites or Heterogeneous agricultural areas), which will have a negative impact in the translation procedure. Unfortunately, the significant costs of generating such a detailed map by remote sensing and visual interpretation lead to a 6year update [48]. Conversely, the OSO product is updated every year, but its nomenclature differs from the standardized European-wide CLC.…”
Section: Water Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge is that both source and target maps have rich and variate nomenclature with non-straightforward semantic relationships. Most works applying CLC translation merge some of the classes of level 2 and focus on a restricted nomenclature of less than ten classes [48][49][50]. Table A1 in the Appendix A details a conceivable semantic association between OSO 2018 and CLC 2018 nomenclatures.…”
Section: Oso To Clc Translation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of the satellite missions involved in the production of ESA-CCI LC is given in table 1. Besides systematic global validation efforts (ESA, 2017;Hua et al, 2018), a few regional approaches investigated the quality of ESA-CCI LC over Europe (Vilar et al, 2019;Reinhart et al, 2021a). (Hastings and Emery, 1992) 4 SPOT Vegetation satellite program (Maisongrande et al, 2004) 5 Project for On-Board Autonomy -Vegetation (Dierckx et al, 2014) 6 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) and Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) (Donlon et al, 2012) 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-251…”
Section: Datasets and Concepts 221 Esa-cci Lcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2014). The LANDMATE PFT map is based on the ESA-CCI LC map which was quality checked and compared to similar LULC products on a global (ESA, 2017;Yang et al, 2017;Hua et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018) and regional level (Reinhart et al, 2021a;Vilar et al, 2019). However, the translation from LULC classes to PFTs necessarily results in change of the map.…”
Section: Water Permanent Snow and Icementioning
confidence: 99%