1999
Comparison of Erbium:YAG and Carbon Dioxide Lasers in Resurfacing of Facial Rhytides
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
225
29
20
2
Citation Types
5
146
1
12
Year Published
1999
2026
Publication Types
Select...
210
50
3
Relationship
7
256
Authors
Journals
Cited by 263 publications
(164 citation statements)
References 6 publications
5
146
1
12
“…In contrast to some claims in the literature [19], the present study failed to demonstrate appreciable differences between both methods in treating peri-orbital rhytides in a meticulously chosen experimental setting with randomized, blind allocation of treatment sites in a split-face design. Correspondingly, this confirms previous comparative reports about non-fractional skin resurfacing [4][5][6][7]. Basically, the efficacy of both methods was roughly equal, and whereas the discomfort was somewhat more pronounced after Er:YAG treatment during the first days (with the notable exception of bleeding), CO 2 treatment was perceived as more unpleasant in the later course of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast to some claims in the literature [19], the present study failed to demonstrate appreciable differences between both methods in treating peri-orbital rhytides in a meticulously chosen experimental setting with randomized, blind allocation of treatment sites in a split-face design. Correspondingly, this confirms previous comparative reports about non-fractional skin resurfacing [4][5][6][7]. Basically, the efficacy of both methods was roughly equal, and whereas the discomfort was somewhat more pronounced after Er:YAG treatment during the first days (with the notable exception of bleeding), CO 2 treatment was perceived as more unpleasant in the later course of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…18 The reduced thermal injury from erbium: YAG laser is felt to allow quicker healing with less untoward effects, less downtime, and comparable results. 19,20 Our own experience supports this Þ nding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This discrepancy in predictors might be partly explained by the difference in the baseline thermal effect (depth of thermal action, CO 2 , 80 to 150 µm vs Er:YAG, <50 µm) between the CO 2 and Er:YAG lasers. [7][8][9] In this study, we also found that overactive bladder symptoms improved after CO 2 laser therapy (Table 3). This phenomenon could be partly explained by urethrogenic therapy; that is, urinary leakage into the proximal urethra triggers the sensory micturition reflex and results in uninhibited detrusor contractions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
