2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Er:YAG Laser and Surgical Drill for Osteotomy in Oral Surgery: An Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2]. Meanwhile, numerous researches have proven the feasibility of using short-pulsed lasers to perform hard tissue ablation [3][4][5][6], which enable higher ablation accuracy without mechanical stress to the patient. Lasers are therefore very suitable for performing microsurgeries on fragile structures such as the cochleostomy (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2]. Meanwhile, numerous researches have proven the feasibility of using short-pulsed lasers to perform hard tissue ablation [3][4][5][6], which enable higher ablation accuracy without mechanical stress to the patient. Lasers are therefore very suitable for performing microsurgeries on fragile structures such as the cochleostomy (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sasaki et al [11] as well as Hibst [12] explain the ‘cold' ablation of the erbium:YAG laser by its maximal energy absorbance in water, which induces rapid steam creation, leading to an explosive destruction of inorganic substances. This property is the basis for the reduced thermal damage in treated bone surfaces compared to when a surgical drill is used [9]. Sasaki et al [13] could not find any carbonization regions in bone tissue after erbium:YAG treatment even after high repetition rates (20 Hz).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yoshino et al [14] revealed that erbium:YAG irradiation did not inhibit cell migration and proliferation, which is a prerequisite for the development of healthy granulation tissue. In addition, Panduric et al [9] demonstrated that the erbium:YAG laser, compared to the surgical drill, does not produce additional bone dust or bone fragments, which increase the chance of local infection, as shown by Stübinger et al [15]. Furthermore, the same group found that the precision of the erbium:YAG laser in osteotomy is much greater than that of a surgical drill [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the antibacterial and detoxifying effects as well as the biological effects of the ErL may improve the wound healing of treated sites [7][8][9][10][11][12] . The ErL applications in dental treatments such as operative dentistry [13][14][15][16] , pediatric dentistry 17,18) , endodontics [19][20][21] , periodontics [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] , and oral surgery 30,31) have increased in recent years. Furthermore, the use of ErL has also been proposed in implant therapy applications such as the implant placement procedure as well as treatment of peri-implantitis [32][33][34][35][36][37] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%