2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we found that the mean EQ-5D-5L score was 0.788 ± 0.222, which was similar to that reported in the studies by Noto et al (Japan, 2020) (0.772 ± 0.215) [29] and Yang et al (Singapore, 2015) (0.704 ± 0.199) using the same instrument [15]. The mean EQ-5D-5L score in this study was higher than that reported in the studies by Morton et [19]. These discrepancies may be explained by the patterns of medical practice and care in different settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we found that the mean EQ-5D-5L score was 0.788 ± 0.222, which was similar to that reported in the studies by Noto et al (Japan, 2020) (0.772 ± 0.215) [29] and Yang et al (Singapore, 2015) (0.704 ± 0.199) using the same instrument [15]. The mean EQ-5D-5L score in this study was higher than that reported in the studies by Morton et [19]. These discrepancies may be explained by the patterns of medical practice and care in different settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In patients undergoing dialysis, QoL has been assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in various nations [15][16][17][18][19]. As a tool to measure the improvement and deterioration in QoL, it can be used to evaluate QoL and subsequently test the effectiveness of interventions to improve QoL among patients with ESRD undergoing HD or PD [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the EQ-5D has limitations in assessing overall HRQoL. Several studies have suggested that the Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D) is more useful and valid than EQ-5D [25,26]. However, the validity and reliability of the EQ-5D has been proven in previous studies, and it has been widely used as a simple method for evaluating quality of life [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although HRQoL among HD patients has been investigated at earlier time in Jordan [ 18 , 29 ], the current study is the first one to use the EQ-5D-5L to explore HRQoL among HD patients in Jordan. The latter instrument is simple, easy to be completed, well recognized, requires shorter time to be finished, and has enhanced sensitiviy as compared with other available instruments for measuring HRQoL among patient population [ 13 , 30 ]. We found that the mean index (± SD) value among HD patients was 0.44 (± 0.42), while findings from other studies that used the same instrument in Palestine, Japan and Korea found utility values of 0.37 (± 0.440) [ 13 ], 0.809 (± 0.184) [ 31 ] and 0.704 (± 0.199) [ 32 ] respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%