2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of EPM and PSIAC models in GIS for erosion and sediment yield assessment in a semi-arid environment: Afzar Catchment, Fars Province, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of soil loss was performed using the Erosion Potential Method (EPMGavrilović 1972), which was developed in Serbia and is still in use, mainly in the countries of the former Yugoslavia and the Western Balkans (Zorn & Komac 2008, Tošić et al 2012, Ristić et al 2013), but also in Iran (Tangestani 2006, Bagherzadeh et al 2011. In this study, the level of erosion was assessed based on annual soil loss (Wyear) immediately before afforestation (Wyear0), 10 years after afforestation (Wyear10) and 60 years after afforestation (Wyear60).…”
Section: Soil Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of soil loss was performed using the Erosion Potential Method (EPMGavrilović 1972), which was developed in Serbia and is still in use, mainly in the countries of the former Yugoslavia and the Western Balkans (Zorn & Komac 2008, Tošić et al 2012, Ristić et al 2013), but also in Iran (Tangestani 2006, Bagherzadeh et al 2011. In this study, the level of erosion was assessed based on annual soil loss (Wyear) immediately before afforestation (Wyear0), 10 years after afforestation (Wyear10) and 60 years after afforestation (Wyear60).…”
Section: Soil Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tangestani [30] compared the Gavrilović and PSIAC model outputs and established that the PSIAC model is more reliable for determining the areas of very high erosion potential. A visual field overview with GPS confirmed a good estimation for areas of moderate and heavy erosion with the Gavrilović method, and a poorer accuracy for areas with slight erosion potential.…”
Section: Comparison Of Gavrilović Methods With Other Erosion Assessmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Bregalnica basin, Republic of Macedonia [19,20], a very good correspondence was obtained between the results obtained using the Gavrilović method and onsite measurements. Haghizadeh et al [21] and Tangestani [30] used a comparison of model output results with field observations and a GLASGOD (Global Assessment of Soil Degradation) map as a verification method. Bagherzadeh et al [16,17] verified model outputs by a field survey using GPS and a visual comparison of areas characterised as areas with moderate and heavy annual sediment yields.…”
Section: Field Measurement and Gavrilović Methods Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPM (erosion potential method) model has been applied for erosion modelling in the Kasilian Watershed. So, practical models can be used to investigate the effect of landuse changes on soil erosion and sediment production (Tangestani 2006). There are four factors in EPM model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%