2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of envelope extraction algorithms for cardiac sound signal segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S3 and S4 are usually low amplitude and low frequency that make them difficult to be detected. These four heart sound components lie in the frequency range of 20-200 Hz [7].…”
Section: Heart Sound As Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S3 and S4 are usually low amplitude and low frequency that make them difficult to be detected. These four heart sound components lie in the frequency range of 20-200 Hz [7].…”
Section: Heart Sound As Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With sample rate at 44.1 kHz the amount of data generated is too large for our purpose, so this signal should be downsampled to 2000 Hz. The reason to choose this downsampling frequency is to make sure that all the heart sound which occurred in this frequency is properly represented [8]. …”
Section: Down Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shannon energy envelope is calculated as shown in Choi's paper [Choi & Jiang, 2008]. The square in the plot indicates the region where the [T1,T2] data points would be for a normal person.…”
Section: Diagnostic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms have been reported so far, and most of them are based on the energy or time-frequency characterization of the signal [1]- [3]. But they are mostly affected by amplitude and frequency variations of the heart sounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%