2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of enhanced microsphere transport in an iron-oxide-coated porous medium by pre-adsorbed and co-depositing organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 0.5 PV pulse of SRHA at 5 mg/L through the column matrix. This produced a monolayer of randomly distributed OM compounds on the sand granular surface, as confirmed in our previous studies. ,, …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 0.5 PV pulse of SRHA at 5 mg/L through the column matrix. This produced a monolayer of randomly distributed OM compounds on the sand granular surface, as confirmed in our previous studies. ,, …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Following that, TPEs were conducted to quantify the impact of SRHA on particle deposition, which consisted of the following: A prolonged pulse of 6 PVs of particle dispersion at 10.4 ppm to allow a sustained increase in concentrations in the column effluent to be generated as breakthrough proceeds. A 0.5 PV pulse of SRHA at 5 mg/L through the column matrix. This produced a monolayer of randomly distributed OM compounds on the sand granular surface, as confirmed in our previous studies. ,, A second 6 PV particle pulse at 10.4 ppm again to display the effect of the adsorbed OM on particle transport. …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In a simple system consisting of only pure water and clean silica sand, positively charged PNPs will be attracted to and retained by the negatively charged sand without any additional intervening processes. , Conversely, the electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged PNPs and the sand will stabilize the PNPs in solution and may improve their mobility. ,,,, Unmodified polystyrene (100 nm) nanoparticles, for example, were found to exhibit behavior similar to a conservative tracer during transport through a natural desert soil (with low OM and clay content) at a low ionic strength and a high pH, which is attributed to the negative ζ potential of both the soil and PNPs . When the fluid phase has a more complex composition, the presence of metal cations can limit the electrostatic repulsion between the particles through charge screening, increasing the relative effects of van der Waals interactions between PNPs and the substrate. ,,, Cations, like Ca 2+ , and dissolved organic matter may also be adsorbed by the PNPs and/or the substrate, mitigating the repulsion between them and facilitating sorption, or directly causing adsorption via cation or polymer bridging. ,,,, While DOM typically limits PNP mobility in soils, particulate organic matter, and in some cases even DOM, can actually increase PNP mobility by becoming attached to the PNP and/or substrate surfaces, resulting in steric or electrostatic repulsion between the PNPs and the substrate. ,, While clean sand can provide initial insights into the mechanisms affecting PNP mobility in soil, natural systems are much more complex.…”
Section: Pnp Transport In Soil and Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorbed organics on surfaces have frequently been reported to create a brush-like surface that diminishes colloid retention and/or increases colloid stability (Kretzschmar and Sticher, 1997;Yang et al, 2010Yang et al, , 2011Yang et al, , 2013Yang et al, , 2014Flynn et al, 2012). This diminished colloid retention or increased stability in the presence of adsorbed organics has typically been attributed to steric repulsion which creates a large energy barrier to interaction in a primary minimum (Espinasse et al, 2007;Han et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%