2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of energy efficiency between ball mills and stirred mills in coarse grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During stages 1 and 2, impact breaking tests to determine the A*b ranking parameter were conducted pre and post-blast. The rotary breakage test (RBT) described by Shi et al (2009) was used for this purpose. The test operates by throwing a set of individual fragments at a known velocity against the walls of a cylindrical device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During stages 1 and 2, impact breaking tests to determine the A*b ranking parameter were conducted pre and post-blast. The rotary breakage test (RBT) described by Shi et al (2009) was used for this purpose. The test operates by throwing a set of individual fragments at a known velocity against the walls of a cylindrical device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Shi et al (2009) have shown that an Isamill (as a horizontally stirred mill) at least at laboratory scale exhibited better grinding efficiency for fine grinding (product less than 40 lm) compared to other (vertical) mills (such as ball and tower mills). In contrast, for coarse grinding they showed that the ball mill was more efficient than the Isamill with fine feed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…... 16 Figure 2.9 -Effect of impeller speed in the stirred mill (Zheng et al, 1996) .17 -(a) Breakage distribution function versus relative particle size (b) Reduced specific rate of breakage and apparent reduced specific rate of breakage versus particle size for copper concentrate batch test in a 6.6 liter Tower Mill (Menacho and Reyes, 1989 Figure 2.18 -Error associated with power scale-up method proposed by Morrell et al (1993) for (a) Tower Mill (b) pin mill (Jankovic, 1999) Tables Table 2.1 -Common gravity induced and fluidized stirred mills and their main features (after (Allen, 2013), (Davey, 2006), (Rahal et al, 2011), (Shi et al, 2009), (Lehto et al, 2013) Table 2.4 -Media cost and consumption rate for stirred mill (after Lichter and Davey, 2006 Mannheim (2011) Table 2.9 -Test conditions described by Stehr et al (1987) Table 2.10 -Breakage parameters developed for a pilot Vertimill test work using the Austin Characterization Procedure (Mazzinghy et al, 2015a) Table 5.2 -% new generation of -75μm in different operating conditions for Cu-Au ore and limestone ..... 100 Table 5 …”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have grinding discs mounted on a horizontal shaft connected to a motor via a gear box. The tip speed of the rotating discs is around 21-23 m/s (Shi et al, 2009), and it imparts intense agitation of the media. In general, ceramic beads are used as grinding media in the IsaMill; however, sand is occasionally used too as grinding media.…”
Section: Stirred Mills Classification and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation