2005
DOI: 10.1097/00042728-200512000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Endovenous Treatment with an 810 nm Laser versus Conventional Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients with Primary Varicose Veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The other endoluminal technique, EVL, can only be used for superficial venous reflux disease and cannot be used safely for perforator venous reflux disease. EVL has not been studied as thoroughly as RFA in comparing the endoluminal technique with open surgery [48,49]. The longest follow-up with clinical results after EVL has been 2 years, whereas detailed results are available at 5-year follow-up for RFA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Endoluminal Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other endoluminal technique, EVL, can only be used for superficial venous reflux disease and cannot be used safely for perforator venous reflux disease. EVL has not been studied as thoroughly as RFA in comparing the endoluminal technique with open surgery [48,49]. The longest follow-up with clinical results after EVL has been 2 years, whereas detailed results are available at 5-year follow-up for RFA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Endoluminal Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies comparing RFA and HL/S methods RFA method has been reported to have significant advantages (10)(11)(12). In a study comparing HL/S and EVLA methods, EVLA was reported to result with less edema and blisters but no other significant differences found between (13). In comparison of foam sclerotherapy to HL/S, HL/S procedure was reported to be superior (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando há comprometimento importante da veia safena, interna ou externa, a fleboextração do segmento acometido permanece sendo o tratamento de escolha [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . Mais recentemente, a fotocoagulação da veia safena com o laser endovenoso aparece como uma alternativa menos invasiva do que a fleboextração convencional [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified