2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotor response after abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent and persistent polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation (COMPARE-IT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observation that RA dilation in response to exercise was not impaired 1 wk postcatheterization contrasts with some previous studies in animals, which have reported a paradoxical vasoconstriction in response to exercise following endothelial denudation (4,30). In addition, two studies in patients performing supine bicycle exercise during a follow-up PTCA reported an exercise-induced constriction in the treated vessels, at 6 mo post-PCI with first generation (38) and at 16 mo with second generation drug-eluting stents (31). However, this impairment may indicate the presence of long-term complications of stenting, such as in-stent restenosis (29), rather than the effects of catheterization-induced damage per se.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our observation that RA dilation in response to exercise was not impaired 1 wk postcatheterization contrasts with some previous studies in animals, which have reported a paradoxical vasoconstriction in response to exercise following endothelial denudation (4,30). In addition, two studies in patients performing supine bicycle exercise during a follow-up PTCA reported an exercise-induced constriction in the treated vessels, at 6 mo post-PCI with first generation (38) and at 16 mo with second generation drug-eluting stents (31). However, this impairment may indicate the presence of long-term complications of stenting, such as in-stent restenosis (29), rather than the effects of catheterization-induced damage per se.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A resposta vasomotora relaciona-se à capacidade do coração em manter a homeostase do tônus vascular, assegurando que o fluxo sanguíneo corresponda à demanda dos músculos esqueléticos e de outros órgãos, seja em repouso e/ou durante o exercício (Puricel et al, 2016;Sandoo, Zanten, Metsios, Carroll, & Kitas et al, 2010). A resposta vasomotora é regulada pela interação de dois mecanismos centrais de controle: a) o controle autonômico do drive neural simpático (controle central ou global) (Sandoo et al, 2010;Thijssen et al, 2014) e b) a capacidade das células endoteliais de responder ao estresse mecânico pela liberação de fatores vasoativos, como óxido nítrico (NO) e acetilcolina (controle periférico) (Pyke & Tschakovsky, 2005;Widlansky, Gokce, Keaney, & Vita, 2003;Wilson, Lee, & Mccarron, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…More recently, studies in patients performing supine bicycle exercise during coronary catheterization reported an exercise-induced paradoxical vasoconstriction in coronary-treated artery, at 6 months post-PCI with 1 st generation [228], and at 16 months with 2 nd generation DES [229], with normal vasodilation in the non-catheterized vessel [229]. VSMC-induced dilation was abolished in the stented area, whereas vasodilation was still apparent proximally and distally to the stent [229]. Coronary vasoconstriction during exercise, 6-months post-PCI, has been implicated in chest-pain with the absence of significant stenosis in a recent case report [135].…”
Section: What Are the Vascular Effects Of Acute Exercise After Ptca/pci?mentioning
confidence: 99%