2014
DOI: 10.1111/den.12266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of endoscopic band ligation and endoclip closure of colonic perforation: Technical feasibility and efficacy in an ex vivo pig model

Abstract: Endoluminal closure of a 1.5-cm colon perforation with EBL decreased procedure time and was not inferior in leak pressure compared with endoclipping in this ex vivo porcine model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there have been recent reports of successful endoscopic closure of iatrogenic bowel perforations by using EBL after the failure of endoclips [ 15 , 16 ]. Also, after our pilot studies on the colon in an ex vivo porcine model [ 17 ], we aimed to evaluate whether colon perforations could be closed effectively with EBL. We explored the feasibility of endoluminal closure of 15-mm perforations by using EBL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there have been recent reports of successful endoscopic closure of iatrogenic bowel perforations by using EBL after the failure of endoclips [ 15 , 16 ]. Also, after our pilot studies on the colon in an ex vivo porcine model [ 17 ], we aimed to evaluate whether colon perforations could be closed effectively with EBL. We explored the feasibility of endoluminal closure of 15-mm perforations by using EBL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group reported rescue EBL for gastric perforation resulting from endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or ulcer, and for iatrogenic colon perforation during endoscopy [ 15 , 16 ]. We also have shown that the technical feasibility and efficacy of EBL in endoluminal closure were not inferior to those of TTS endoclips in an ex vivo porcine model [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intestinal perforation during routine colonoscopy occurs at times, such a large perforation and adjacent to the anus is rare . It carries enormous challenges for management and risk of severe infection and potential injury to the anus.…”
Section: Brief Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBL is easy, safe, quick and effective. Lee et al[26] compared the EBL technique with endoclips for the closure of colonic perforations. Closure by EBL was faster than closure by endoclipping (3.2 ± 1.7 min vs 6.8 ± 1.3 min, P < 0.01).…”
Section: New Devices and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBL may prolong the hospital stay by binding together more tissue than required. In addition, it can cause injury to adjacent organs[25,26,54]. Further studies and developments are needed to expand EBL’s clinical use.…”
Section: New Devices and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%