1985
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.38.5.554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ELISA with virus isolation for the diagnosis of genital herpes.

Abstract: SUMMARY An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system which detects and simultaneously types herpes simplex virus antigens in clinical specimens from patients with genital herpes has been compared with standard tissue culture isolation. Although more sensitive than a similar method previously described and also more sensitive than electron microscopy and immunofluorescence, ELISA did not detect all the viruses isolated in tissue culture. Costs were comparable. The speed of obtaining the result together w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of selected specimens may partly explain the wide variation in antigen detection rate achieved by different groups [Vestergaard and Jensen, 1981 ;Adler Storthz et al, 1983;Grillner and Landqvist, 1983;Lawrence et al, 1984;Morgan and Smith, 1984;Nerurkar et al, 1984;Warford et al, 1984;Alexander et al, 1985;Clayton et al, 19851. For this reason it is prudent to use the same panel of unselected specimens for comparative evaluation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of selected specimens may partly explain the wide variation in antigen detection rate achieved by different groups [Vestergaard and Jensen, 1981 ;Adler Storthz et al, 1983;Grillner and Landqvist, 1983;Lawrence et al, 1984;Morgan and Smith, 1984;Nerurkar et al, 1984;Warford et al, 1984;Alexander et al, 1985;Clayton et al, 19851. For this reason it is prudent to use the same panel of unselected specimens for comparative evaluation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was interesting to find that antigen detection rates varied considerably when specimens were selected on the basis of two clinical parameters, being high with penile vesicular lesions (25/27, 93%) and low with vulva1 erosions (20/35, 57%). The use of selected specimens may partly explain the wide variation in antigen detection rate achieved by different groups [Vestergaard and Jensen, 1981 ;Adler Storthz et al, 1983;Grillner and Landqvist, 1983;Lawrence et al, 1984;Morgan and Smith, 1984;Nerurkar et al, 1984;Warford et al, 1984;Alexander et al, 1985;Clayton et al, 19851. For this reason it is prudent to use the same panel of unselected specimens for comparative evaluation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of EIA appears to be lowest (approximately 34%) when it is performed on cervical specimens obtained from asymptomatic females (94,95). In contrast, when EIA is applied to the testitig of symptomatic patients with suspicious clinical lesions, a sensitivity of 84% has been demonstrated (93).…”
Section: Antigen-detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The crux of ELISA lies in its capacity to detect and quantify the antibody-antigen binding event through the enzyme's catalytic activity. This catalysis results in the conversion of a reagent into a discernible signal, which can be harnessed to estimate the concentration of the antigen (as illustrated in Figure 3) (74)(75)(76). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is a commonly used enzyme in ELISA setups due to its ability to amplify signals and enhance assay sensitivity (31).…”
Section: 29mentioning
confidence: 99%