2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation pretreatment for enhanced virus removal using microfiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
98
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Effect of charge loading and electrode material on E. coli concentration: current density 12.5 mA/cm 2 ; initial pH 7.1; supporting electrolyte NaNO 3 by electrocoagulation was predominantly due to adsorption of the negatively charged E. coli onto the positively charged iron and aluminum flocs and the subsequent removal of the flocs by microfiltration. However, E. coli inactivation at high Fe(III) and Al(III) dosages was attributed to enmeshment prior to removal by microfiltration (Zhu et al 2005). This effect explains the fact that inactivation efficiency is lowest with carbon graphite, given that no metal cation and no flocs are generated with this electrode.…”
Section: Effect Of Electrode Materials On Inactivation Of E Colimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 Effect of charge loading and electrode material on E. coli concentration: current density 12.5 mA/cm 2 ; initial pH 7.1; supporting electrolyte NaNO 3 by electrocoagulation was predominantly due to adsorption of the negatively charged E. coli onto the positively charged iron and aluminum flocs and the subsequent removal of the flocs by microfiltration. However, E. coli inactivation at high Fe(III) and Al(III) dosages was attributed to enmeshment prior to removal by microfiltration (Zhu et al 2005). This effect explains the fact that inactivation efficiency is lowest with carbon graphite, given that no metal cation and no flocs are generated with this electrode.…”
Section: Effect Of Electrode Materials On Inactivation Of E Colimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to some investigators, the major mechanism of the inactivation of bacteria in the electrochemical cell is disinfection by electrochemically generated oxidants (Diao et al 2004;Drees et al 2003;Jeong et al 2006); 3. High ionic strength due to metallic species (cations) liberated in solution, which act by charge neutralization on microorganisms (Vega-Mercado et al 1997), and metallic hydroxides (flocs) formed as a result of coagulation which act by ''sweep flocculation or enmeshment'' and adsorption (Zhu et al 2005). In fact, the solid oxides, hydroxides and oxyhydroxides provide active surfaces for the adsorption of the polluting species, and they create a sludge blanket that entraps and bridges colloidal particles in the aqueous medium (Mollah et al 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of Electrode Materials On Inactivation Of E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EC is a an emerging and efficient method in water treatment where the flocculating agent is generated by ion exchange process using electrochemical of a sacrificial anode [13,14]. In electrocoagulation process, there is no addition of chemicals to the water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%