2017
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of elastic properties of open‐cell metallic biomaterials with different unit cell types

Abstract: Additive manufacturing techniques have made it possible to create open-cell porous structures with arbitrary micro-geometrical characteristics. Since a wide range of micro-geometrical features is available for making an implant, having a comprehensive knowledge of the mechanical response of cellular structures is very useful. In this study, finite element simulations have been carried out to investigate the effect of structure unit cell type (cube, rhombic dodecahedron, Kelvin, Weaire-Phelan, and diamond), cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield stress of the rhombic dodecahedron was somewhat lower than the truncated cuboctahedron, while their values started to overlap at higher values of relative density [18,19]. The cube, on the other hand, possessesed the highest yield stress and first maximal stress in all studies (Figure 6 and Figure 7) [12,18,19,42,45,51]. In terms of the Young’s modulus, the cube was surpassed by the truncated cube, which has been shown to be the stiffest unit cell studied [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield stress of the rhombic dodecahedron was somewhat lower than the truncated cuboctahedron, while their values started to overlap at higher values of relative density [18,19]. The cube, on the other hand, possessesed the highest yield stress and first maximal stress in all studies (Figure 6 and Figure 7) [12,18,19,42,45,51]. In terms of the Young’s modulus, the cube was surpassed by the truncated cube, which has been shown to be the stiffest unit cell studied [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it was a simple model, it could only be used for the foamed structure material with a relative lower density. After correcting and optimizing this simple model, the cubic plate model was developed, and then the docecahedral [6] and tetrakaidecahedral models [7] were generated through further model optimization. However, these simple models could not approximate the real inner pore structure of metal foam, leading to significant difference between the simulation results and the experimental results.…”
Section: Three Dimensional Modeling Methods Of Mimics Adjacent Mask Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this purpose, both regular and irregular scaffold geometries were proposed and investigated. The regular scaffolds include unit cell configurations all with the same shape and dimensions that are regularly replicated in the scaffold volume [1,2]. Analytical solutions were recently developed that put in relationship the equivalent material properties of the entire scaffold with the dimensions and the material properties of the single unit cell [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%