2016
DOI: 10.4103/0976-500x.195901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study

Abstract: Objective:To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of allergic rhinitis (AR).Materials and Methods:A 2-week, single-centered, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparative clinical study was conducted on patients with AR. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 67 patients were recruited and randomized to two treatment groups and received the respective drugs for 2 weeks. At follow-up, parameters assessed were total nasal symptom score (TNSS),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several studies, the difference in TNSS for each subject was calculated, seeking to establish the reduction gradient in the score. 1,4,6,[13][14][15]17,21 In the present study, a significant (p<0.05) and progressive decrease in the TNSS was observed from baseline over the 14 day treatment period with different non-sedative antihistamines. Rupatadine was found to be more significant (P-value .000897) in reducing TNSS and improving signs of allergic rhinitis after 2 weeks of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In several studies, the difference in TNSS for each subject was calculated, seeking to establish the reduction gradient in the score. 1,4,6,[13][14][15]17,21 In the present study, a significant (p<0.05) and progressive decrease in the TNSS was observed from baseline over the 14 day treatment period with different non-sedative antihistamines. Rupatadine was found to be more significant (P-value .000897) in reducing TNSS and improving signs of allergic rhinitis after 2 weeks of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…8,18,21,22 Rupatadine is known as a dual blocker since this drug not only block the action of histamine but also of other inflammatory mediators such as PAF, LTs, and chemokines. 1,10 It is well recognized that second-generation antihistamines have generally non-sedating property; however it does not mean that somnolence is never occur with these therapies. 17 In our study somnolence is reported in a small minority of patients, it should be noted that in our trial, at the end of each weekly treatment period, patients were actively asked to report any adverse symptom or event that they may have experienced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations