2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep37826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of efficacy of simo decoction and acupuncture or chewing gum alone on postoperative ileus in colorectal cancer resection: a randomized trial

Abstract: To compared the ability of chewing gum or simo decoction (SMD) and acupuncture to reduce incidence of postoperative ileus (POI) after colorectal cancer resection, patients with colorectal cancer undergoing open or laparoscopic resection were randomized to receive SMD and acupuncture (n = 196), chewing gum alone (n = 197) or no intervention (n = 197) starting on postoperative day 1 and continuing for 5 consecutive days. Patients treated with SMD and acupuncture experienced significantly shorter hospital stay, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(a) describes all of the bias classifications for the included RCTs, with the summary of qualitative methodological quality according to the bias classification (“low risk,” “unclear risk,” and “high risk”) which was presented in Figure 2(b) . Concisely, although all included RCTs mentioned randomization in their research, only nine studies [ 17 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 32 ] reported correct method of random sequence generation which marked as low risk of selection bias, and only six RCTs [ 17 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 31 ] described adequate allocation concealments, which serves as a strategy to prevent against ascertainment bias and scored as low risk of bias. In general, sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes are assigned to each participant to prevent selective bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2(a) describes all of the bias classifications for the included RCTs, with the summary of qualitative methodological quality according to the bias classification (“low risk,” “unclear risk,” and “high risk”) which was presented in Figure 2(b) . Concisely, although all included RCTs mentioned randomization in their research, only nine studies [ 17 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 , 32 ] reported correct method of random sequence generation which marked as low risk of selection bias, and only six RCTs [ 17 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 31 ] described adequate allocation concealments, which serves as a strategy to prevent against ascertainment bias and scored as low risk of bias. In general, sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes are assigned to each participant to prevent selective bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate blinding of personnel, participants, and outcome assessment is necessary to prevent against performance and detection bias; however, only one study [ 25 ] explicitly described how to maintain patient blinding in all included research, and six RCTs [ 17 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 31 ] had mentioned the blinding design for assessing the outcomes. Verification on selective reporting of outcomes is necessary because it may help to evaluate the integrity of outcome reporting and protect against bias, yet the majority of the included studies [ 16 , 18 – 23 , 25 29 , 31 , 32 ] did not provide sufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists; thus, we judged the risk of other potential sources of bias as unclear. Most of the included studies appear to be free of other sources of bias except for two studies [ 26 , 32 ], so we judged the risk of bias as low risk for these trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been used abundantly to regulate gastrointestinal function and bloating in clinical applications for a thousand years [ 1 , 2 ]. Literature shows that SMD combined some methods e.g., chewing gum or acupuncture, could enhance bowel function recovery, prevent postoperative ileus, and shorten hospital stay in postoperative patients [ 3 , 4 ]. The positive effects may be due to its participation of the regulation of gastrointestinal hormones of the digestive system, and promotion of gastrointestinal motility by promoting contraction of smooth muscle [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same surgical residents will listen to the bowel sounds every 4 h postoperatively. Time to first bowel motion is the duration until regular bowel sounds (more than two sounds every minute) are first heard after surgery [17] . To observe changes in plasma brain-gut peptides, such as 5-HT, substance P (SP), vasoactive gut peptide (VIP), gastrin and cholecystokinin (CCK), we will collect venous blood from patients before the operation and 1 st day and 3 rd day after the operation and then will centrifuge and freeze the plasma supernatant for later testing.…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%