2017
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10052-0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Efficacy of Buccal Fat Pad and Collagen Membrane in Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Abstract: Background and objectives: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic progressive premalignant condition, characterized by gradual trismus of mouth. The study was done to compare the efficacy of buccal fat pad (BFP) and collagen membrane as an interpositional material in surgical management of OSMF and also (1) to assess and compare the mouth opening achieved in both groups of patient; (2) the improvement in flexibility of buccal mucosa in both groups; (3) oral pain and burning sensation on intake of spicy fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, collagen is well tolerated with no adverse effects. These findings was similar to the study by Randhawa et al 15 Most crucial method for controlling scarring have been controlling infection and minimizing growth of granulation tissue. Collagen membrane appeared to satisfy these goals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Clinically, collagen is well tolerated with no adverse effects. These findings was similar to the study by Randhawa et al 15 Most crucial method for controlling scarring have been controlling infection and minimizing growth of granulation tissue. Collagen membrane appeared to satisfy these goals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results were both clinically and statistically significant for all the three evaluated parameters. No adverse reactions were observed in both the study groups which is in accordance with the published literature [ 13 - 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%