2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of effects of training programs for final year nursing students in Turkey: Differences in self-efficacy with regard to information literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of different nursing education models on students: There were studies in the literature that have analyzed the effect of different nursing education models on students. It was reported in the literature that the conflict resolution (Seren & Ustun, 2008), problem solving (Yalcin et al, 2006) skills and critical thinking disposition (Dagistani et al, 2016;Lewis et al, 2009) of students were higher in PBL education and PBL had a stronger influence on development of students' self-perceptions regarding information literacy (Özbıçakçı, Gezer, & Bilik, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of different nursing education models on students: There were studies in the literature that have analyzed the effect of different nursing education models on students. It was reported in the literature that the conflict resolution (Seren & Ustun, 2008), problem solving (Yalcin et al, 2006) skills and critical thinking disposition (Dagistani et al, 2016;Lewis et al, 2009) of students were higher in PBL education and PBL had a stronger influence on development of students' self-perceptions regarding information literacy (Özbıçakçı, Gezer, & Bilik, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was found that the total academic achievement of students in the PBL group was higher. Özbıçakçı, Gezer and Bilik (2015) reported that information literacy of students was higher in the PBL method, and Dagistani et al (2016) declared that the critical thinking ability of PBL students was better. Since the academic achievement of the students in the PBL method was found to be higher, the main affecting factors were thought to be critical thinking, self-education, and information literacy and combined learning capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kolstad, 2015), the librarian co-teaches with nursing faculty during work placement; in other settings the focus is more on finding and appraising research evidence in the classroom. Generally, there is more support (certainly from librarians) for clinically focussed information literacy programmes integrated into the curriculum, although the differences in outcomes between traditional and integrated programmes may not be substantial (Farrell et al , 2013; Özbıçakçı et al , 2015; McGowan, 2019). Munn and Small (2017) in a systematic review on the best way of developing information literacy and academic skills among first-year health science students points out that there is poor student uptake when support programmes are not embedded.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale was further tested for factor loading and reliability by Usluel (2007). The ILSES has been applied in the medical discipline as a measure of the IL self-efficacy of nursing students (Özbıçakçı, Gezer, & Bilik, 2015;Robertson & Felicilda-Reynaldo, 2015). As Kurbanoglu (2003) suggested, self-efficacy is "domain-specific" (p. 636).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%