2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of effects of 4-hydroxy tamoxifen and trilostane on oestrogen-regulated gene expression in MCF-7 cells: Up-regulation of oestrogen receptor beta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a concentrationdependent inhibition of 17β-estradiol-stimulated EREreporter activity in both MCF-7 and T-47D breast cancer cells by trilostane, with a threshold inhibition at 1 μM trilostane, an action similar to that of tamoxifen, which also inhibits 17β-estradiol-dependent ERE-reporter activity (Weatherman and Scanlan 2001). Moreover, in a comparative study of the effects of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and trilostane, in the presence of 17β-estradiol on gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells using microarrays, the same authors observed selective up-regulation of ERβ by trilostane, but not 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (Barker et al 2006). The authors particularly propose that trilostane-specific up-regulation of ERβ could explain its positive benefit rates in acquired tamoxifen resistance (Barker et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, a concentrationdependent inhibition of 17β-estradiol-stimulated EREreporter activity in both MCF-7 and T-47D breast cancer cells by trilostane, with a threshold inhibition at 1 μM trilostane, an action similar to that of tamoxifen, which also inhibits 17β-estradiol-dependent ERE-reporter activity (Weatherman and Scanlan 2001). Moreover, in a comparative study of the effects of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and trilostane, in the presence of 17β-estradiol on gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells using microarrays, the same authors observed selective up-regulation of ERβ by trilostane, but not 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (Barker et al 2006). The authors particularly propose that trilostane-specific up-regulation of ERβ could explain its positive benefit rates in acquired tamoxifen resistance (Barker et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, in a comparative study of the effects of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and trilostane, in the presence of 17β-estradiol on gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells using microarrays, the same authors observed selective up-regulation of ERβ by trilostane, but not 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (Barker et al 2006). The authors particularly propose that trilostane-specific up-regulation of ERβ could explain its positive benefit rates in acquired tamoxifen resistance (Barker et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extending these concepts, Barker et al have shown that in rats, 7-day treatment with trilostane 4 mg/kg/day produces an increase in the ratio of ER-β to ER-α, but does not result in increased overall expression of ER in the uteri of treated animals [22]. Gene arrays highlight the difference in the mode of action of trilostane and tamoxifen.…”
Section: Trilostane: Novel Mode Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%