2016
DOI: 10.5603/gp.2016.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of effectiveness of treatment of patients with sporadic and germline BRCA1-related ovarian cancer

Abstract: Results:The 5-year overall survival rate was 42.9% for BRCA1-OC patients and 34.3% for SOC patients (p = 0.354). Mean time to progression was 22.7 and 14.5 months for BRCA1-OC and SOC group, respectively (p = 0.05). Complete response to primary surgery and first line chemotherapy was obtained in 42.5% and 37.9% of cases, respectively; the difference, however, did not reach the statistical significance. Conclusions:Results of combined treatment in the group of BRCA1-related OC patients seem to be better than in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these included articles, 50 studies 6,7,9–12,18–61 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and the clinical features of ovarian cancer, and 22 studies 6,7,9,11,12,21,28,32,38–40,44,45,48,49,52,53,58–60,62,63 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and surgical outcomes. Also, 48 studies ,6–12,18,21,26–30,32–41,44–49,52–54,57–71 evaluated the relationship between BRCAms and the prognosis of ovarian cancer. The quality assessment showed that the NOS score of each study was not less than 7, indicating that the methodological quality was generally good.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among these included articles, 50 studies 6,7,9–12,18–61 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and the clinical features of ovarian cancer, and 22 studies 6,7,9,11,12,21,28,32,38–40,44,45,48,49,52,53,58–60,62,63 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and surgical outcomes. Also, 48 studies ,6–12,18,21,26–30,32–41,44–49,52–54,57–71 evaluated the relationship between BRCAms and the prognosis of ovarian cancer. The quality assessment showed that the NOS score of each study was not less than 7, indicating that the methodological quality was generally good.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these included articles, 50 studies 6,7,9-12,18-61 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and the clinical features of ovarian cancer, and 22 studies 6,7,9,11,12,21,28,32,[38][39][40]44,45,48,49,52,53,[58][59][60]62,63 evaluated the relationship between patients with BRCAms and surgical outcomes. Also, 48 studies , [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]18,21,[26][27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of a sufficiently accurate screening test and the non-specific character of symptoms in an early stage impede the diagnosis and thus decrease the chance for survival [ 4 ]. Screening tests do not even include women with diagnosed mutation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes [ 5 , 6 ]. Only 20–30% of cases are diagnosed in stage I and II, and the remaining 70% cases are diagnosed in stage III and IV [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%