2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00842-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of effectiveness of carvedilol versus metoprolol or atenolol for atrial fibrillation appearing after coronary artery bypass grafting or cardiac valve operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
42
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] Telmisartan has the longest half-life of any ARB (approximately 24 hours) 20 and has been shown to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical studies of hypertensive patients, [21][22][23][24] as well as in the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) and Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in ACE-I iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, although no reduction in new-onset AF was found. [25][26][27] The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy of an antihypertensive therapeutic dose of telmisartan (80 mg once daily) as compared with that of the β-blocker carvedilol (25 mg once daily), which has been shown to have clinically important anti-arrhythmic properties, [28][29][30][31][32] for the prevention of AF recurrence in a population of hypertensive patients with a recent history of AF and who were in sinus rhythm and who did not require anti-arrhythmic therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] Telmisartan has the longest half-life of any ARB (approximately 24 hours) 20 and has been shown to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical studies of hypertensive patients, [21][22][23][24] as well as in the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) and Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in ACE-I iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, although no reduction in new-onset AF was found. [25][26][27] The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy of an antihypertensive therapeutic dose of telmisartan (80 mg once daily) as compared with that of the β-blocker carvedilol (25 mg once daily), which has been shown to have clinically important anti-arrhythmic properties, [28][29][30][31][32] for the prevention of AF recurrence in a population of hypertensive patients with a recent history of AF and who were in sinus rhythm and who did not require anti-arrhythmic therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] A study by Haghjoo et al demonstrated the efficacy of carvedilol on POAF, 2 and Meritt at al showed the significant advantage of postoperative carvedilol treatment vs metoprolol and atenolol. 3 The COMPACT trial is a large multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that is directly comparing oral carvedilol with oral metoprolol and will probably finally show whether there is a significant effect of carvedilol on POAF in patients following surgical coronary revascularization. 5 Unfortunately the study by Tsuboi et al 1 has many limitations that undermine their findings.…”
Section: Letter By Banach Et Al Regarding Article "Postoperative Trementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). 37 Carvedilol was compared with amiodarone in a placebo-controlled trial of patients with chronic AF undergoing electrical cardioversion. 38 Patients were randomized to receive carvedilol, amiodarone, or no antiarrhythmic drug for 6 weeks before and after external transthoracic cardioversion.…”
Section: Clinical Data Atrial Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%