2019
DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Vaginal Versus Oral Misoprostol in Treatment of Missed Miscarriage

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In recent years’ medical management with misoprostol is an effective alternative to surgical evacuation. But there is a dearth of evidence to reveal the effectiveness of the different routes of misoprostol and satisfaction rate among the patients treated with these routes. AIM: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and patient’s satisfaction rate of vaginal versus oral misoprostol. METHODS: It was a prospective non-interventional study. One hundred women of having missed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several risks, such as postoperative infection, accompany surgical procedures. However, effective, safe, and socially acceptable medical care has emerged in recent years (4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several risks, such as postoperative infection, accompany surgical procedures. However, effective, safe, and socially acceptable medical care has emerged in recent years (4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6 7 ] Some studies have reported higher effectiveness of vaginal administration over the oral route,[ 8 ] while a study by Mohammadi et al has stated that there is no significant difference between the success rate of the vaginal and oral route. [ 9 ] A study by Singh et al [ 10 ] showed that the success rate of treatment in both vaginal and sublingual routes is not significantly different, but the side effects of the drug such as diarrhea and fatigue are reported higher in sublingual administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%