2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01103.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ecosystem water‐use efficiency among Douglas‐fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques

Abstract: Comparisons were made among Douglas-fir forest, aspen (broad leaf deciduous) forest and wheatgrass (C 3 ) grassland for ecosystem-level water-use efficiency (WUE). WUE was defined as the ratio of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation rate and evapotranspiration (ET) rate. The ET data measured by eddy covariance were screened so that they overwhelmingly represented transpiration. The three sites used in this comparison spanned a range of vegetation (plant functional) types and environmental conditions within western… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
174
4
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
18
174
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface litter and SOM d 13 C show consistent relationship with d 13 C of CO 2 respired by the ecosystem representing a spatially integrated estimate of isotope signals [Ponton et al, 2006]. Therefore more investigations on community-and landscape-level d 13 C possibly recorded in soils from different climate areas are of significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Surface litter and SOM d 13 C show consistent relationship with d 13 C of CO 2 respired by the ecosystem representing a spatially integrated estimate of isotope signals [Ponton et al, 2006]. Therefore more investigations on community-and landscape-level d 13 C possibly recorded in soils from different climate areas are of significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…4) was used widely as an indicator of water use efficiency at the leaf, plant and ecosystem scale (e.g. Bonal et al, 2000;Lauteri et al, 2004;Saurer et al, 2004;Ponton et al, 2006) in retrospective studies of carbon-water relations based on biological archives (see Sect. 2.6), and in breeding crop varieties for improved yield under water-limited conditions (Condon et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bulk Leaf Tissue δ 13 C and δ 18 O And Water Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al [18] analyzed the seasonal variation of the WUE in an ecosystem and demonstrated spatial patterns of ecosystem variables such as GPP, ET, and WUE at 1 km spatial resolution over three local flux tower sites in China between 2003 and 2005. Despite the completion of many studies focused on flux tower measurements, only a limited number of flux tower field measurements for WUE have been available in recent decades, and for only a few ecosystems, in comparison to the development of eddy covariance systems [24][25][26] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%