2019
DOI: 10.1111/add.14780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of e‐cigarette use characteristics between exclusive e‐cigarette users and dual e‐cigarette and conventional cigarette users: an on‐line survey in France

Abstract: Background and Aims Completely substituting e‐cigarettes (EC) for combustible tobacco cigarettes reduces exposure to toxicants and carcinogens. However, a large proportion of EC users (dual users) continue to smoke conventional cigarettes. This study aimed to compare estimated nicotine intake and e‐cigarette use characteristics between exclusive EC users and dual users. Design Web‐based anonymous cross‐sectional survey. Setting France. Participants A total of 3189 adults, current users of electronic cigarettes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, conventional tobacco use is known to cause both cough and increased sleep latency 34 , 35 . Dual users have been found to have higher levels of nicotine exposure relative to use of either inhalant alone 10 , and the increased time to fall asleep may be directly due to the activating effects of nicotine in the central nervous system (CNS). It is also possible, however, that the higher incidence of cough may alone result in the longer sleep latency found in this cohort 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Historically, conventional tobacco use is known to cause both cough and increased sleep latency 34 , 35 . Dual users have been found to have higher levels of nicotine exposure relative to use of either inhalant alone 10 , and the increased time to fall asleep may be directly due to the activating effects of nicotine in the central nervous system (CNS). It is also possible, however, that the higher incidence of cough may alone result in the longer sleep latency found in this cohort 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As dual users reported the highest use of drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine relative to all other groups, the gateway hypothesis may be a possible explanation 42 . Since dual users have been found to have higher levels of nicotine exposure 10 , it is possible that dual use may create an increased priming effect for drug use and increased facilitation of stimulant addiction compared to sole inhalant use of tobacco or e-cigarettes. Another explanation may be that dual users believe that other drugs are either less risky or more pleasurable than e-cigarettes and conventional tobacco.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, conventional tobacco is well known to cause both cough and increased sleep latency (20,21). As dual users have been found to have higher levels of nicotine exposure relative to use of either inhalant alone (22), the increased time to fall asleep may be directly due to the activating effects of nicotine in the central nervous system (CNS). It is also possible that the higher incidence of bothersome cough may itself result in longer sleep latency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These battery-powered devices vaporize a glycerol and propylene glycol-based liquid with or without nicotine at various concentrations and different flavors and are believed to be less toxic than conventional cigarettes. Electronic cigarettes are now used more frequently than pharmacological treatments to quit smoking in some countries (Adkison, et al, 2013;Adriaens, Van Gucht, Declerck, & Baeyens, 2014;Berlin, Nalpas, Targhetta, & Perney, 2019;Etter, 2010;Hartmann-Boyce, Begh, & Aveyard, 2018). In adult smokers, the use of electronic cigarettes is associated with a decreased number of cigarettes consumed per day and an increased likelihood of cessation attempt at follow-up in both randomized controlled studies (Adriaens, et al, 2014;Bullen, et al, 2013; S. H. Lee, Ahn, & Cheong, 2019;O'Brien, Knight-West, Walker, Parag, & Bullen, 2015) and observational studies (Brose, Hitchman, Brown, West, & McNeill, 2015;Etter & Bullen, 2014;Gomajee, et al, 2019), with a duration of follow-up ranging from 6 to 24 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%