2011
DOI: 10.4171/cmh/241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dynamical degrees for semi-conjugate meromorphic maps

Abstract: Abstract. Let f W X ! X be a dominant meromorphic map on a projective manifold X which preserves a meromorphic fibration W X ! Y of X over a projective manifold Y . We establish formulas relating the dynamical degrees of f , the dynamical degrees of f relative to the fibration and the dynamical degrees of the map g W Y ! Y induced by f . Applications are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the algebraic setting, over fields K different from C, there is still no definition of cohomological entropy. There are indications [6,12,26] that one should be willing to work with objects such asétale topology -seemingly further away from dynamical systems -in order to come closer to satisfying Gromov -Yomdin 's theorem. In fact, for automorphisms of compact surfaces, the work in [12] relates the quantity in Gromov -Yomdin's theorem to l-adic cohomology, which suggests that we may even need to deal with stranger objects thanétale topology.…”
Section: Algebraicétale Dynamical Systems and Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the algebraic setting, over fields K different from C, there is still no definition of cohomological entropy. There are indications [6,12,26] that one should be willing to work with objects such asétale topology -seemingly further away from dynamical systems -in order to come closer to satisfying Gromov -Yomdin 's theorem. In fact, for automorphisms of compact surfaces, the work in [12] relates the quantity in Gromov -Yomdin's theorem to l-adic cohomology, which suggests that we may even need to deal with stranger objects thanétale topology.…”
Section: Algebraicétale Dynamical Systems and Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when K = C, the fact that the dynamical degrees are invariant under generically finite semi-conjugacies ( [6], see [26] for a generalisation to correspondences) is an evidence in support of the philosophy that to understand the dynamics of a rational map f : X → X, it is useful and necessary to study all rational maps f ′ : X ′ → X ′ (or even correspondences) which are semi-conjugate to f via a generically finite rational map…”
Section: Algebraicétale Dynamical Systems and Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3]). In particular, |aF ′ | (a > 0) is composed of a pencil (necessarily parametrized by a curve B ∼ = P 1 because the irregularity q(B) ≤ q(X) = 0) stabilized by f w .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems When P =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primitivity of f can also be detected from dynamical degrees via the following criterion (see [36]), which is a consequence of results in [19] and [20]: If λ 1 (f ) = λ 2 (f ) then f is primitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%