2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nailing in tibial diaphyseal fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been no studies to date assessing which type of distal locking is most beneficial for the treatment of fractures of the subtrochanteric region. In addition, there have been very few published studies to date that specifically compared the biomechanical and clinical effects of the intramedullary nail locking configurations [16,17,34,35]. In 1999, Brumback et al [36] published the results of a study for which the main objective was to test the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of immediate loading after the treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures with intramedullary nail with static locking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been no studies to date assessing which type of distal locking is most beneficial for the treatment of fractures of the subtrochanteric region. In addition, there have been very few published studies to date that specifically compared the biomechanical and clinical effects of the intramedullary nail locking configurations [16,17,34,35]. In 1999, Brumback et al [36] published the results of a study for which the main objective was to test the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of immediate loading after the treatment of diaphyseal femur fractures with intramedullary nail with static locking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%