2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dynamic simulations and the ISO 52016 standard for the assessment of building energy performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the control method assumes that there is a tool that is easy to use but gives reliable results in a view of estimated building energy calculation, paper also gives validation of one tool that is implemented in BIM environment and directly translates information model to energy model. Validation is performed in two ways-comparing the results following the standard ASHRAE 14:2014, and by modeling selected buildings described in more detail in the paper [13] by comparing the results for required annual heating and cooling energies from that paper with those from the Energy Evaluation tool for same inputs.…”
Section: Motivation and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the control method assumes that there is a tool that is easy to use but gives reliable results in a view of estimated building energy calculation, paper also gives validation of one tool that is implemented in BIM environment and directly translates information model to energy model. Validation is performed in two ways-comparing the results following the standard ASHRAE 14:2014, and by modeling selected buildings described in more detail in the paper [13] by comparing the results for required annual heating and cooling energies from that paper with those from the Energy Evaluation tool for same inputs.…”
Section: Motivation and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors often use buildings from the BESTEST, and climate from location that is point of their interest, nationally standardized NZEBs, or building and location of their choice. The literature review from [13] shows that results for standard ISO 13790:2008 differ from those from BESTEST or reference buildings in a range 11-114%. The paper shows the validation of algorithm created by following the ISO 52016-1:2017 and when comparing the algorithm results and the results from ANSI/ASHRAE 140, the maximum differences between the result and mean value from BESTEST is 14% for heating and 10% for cooling.…”
Section: Building Energy Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a replacement of the simplified method used in ISO 13790:2008, the ISO 52016-1:2017 standard introduced a new methodology for the assessment of the building energy performance. To the best of the authors' knowledge, a limited number of studies have been carried out for the performance of the standard with respect to the hourly heating and cooling energy needs of buildings [50], [51]. In [50], the quasi-steady procedure of EN ISO 52016-1, which uses the concept of the utilization factors for energy gains and heat transfer, was developed.…”
Section: Main Paper Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [51] presents a comprehensive analysis of the ISO 52016-1:2017 accuracy with respect to a wide range of building uses, envelope properties, as well as annual and hourly heating/cooling needs. The analysis was performed by comparing the results from the standard with the dynamic simulation in TRNSYS.…”
Section: Main Paper Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%