IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37612)
DOI: 10.1109/cibcb.2004.1393956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dynamic programming and evolutionary algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison against the Nussinov DPA [17] in terms of prediction accuracy was performed [8]. A parallel version of RnaPredict, P-RnaPredict, was developed using a coarsegrained distributed EA [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison against the Nussinov DPA [17] in terms of prediction accuracy was performed [8]. A parallel version of RnaPredict, P-RnaPredict, was developed using a coarsegrained distributed EA [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm performance was compared to the Nussinov DP algorithm [16] in [17]. Recent research includes the creation of a hybrid algorithm through the combination of RnaPredict with a clustering algorithm [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Deschênes and Wiese [5] have shown that RnaPredict, using two stacking based thermodynamic models, can predict certain RNA secondary structures with very high accuracy and also outperform a dynamic programming algorithm [6]. Our specific work builds on [11,10], in which a serial simulation of a distributed version of RnaPredict was implemented that predicted the secondary structure of RNA molecules from input RNA sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%