1994
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9418(94)90020-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dynamic mechanical measurements and Tg determinations with two different instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the temperature at which tanδ reached its maximum was defined as the softening temperature (T g ) of the in-situ lignin, because it is independent of the specimen's dimension (Hagen and Salmén 1994). The apparent activation energy (ΔH a ) for the softening process was determined by Equation (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the temperature at which tanδ reached its maximum was defined as the softening temperature (T g ) of the in-situ lignin, because it is independent of the specimen's dimension (Hagen and Salmén 1994). The apparent activation energy (ΔH a ) for the softening process was determined by Equation (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, noncovalent interactions (mainly hydrogen bonding interactions) among the wood components are much weaker than that between water and the wood cell wall. Under soaked condition, the T g is between 50°C and 100°C, depending on the native lignin structure and the frequency of the measurement (Sadoh 1981;Hagen and Salmén 1994;Song et al 2014;Zhan et al 2016). A clear relation between lignin structure and wood softening has not yet been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAEs for the predicted results estimated by SVR were less than those of QSPR for both the training set and validation set. Thus, the prediction errors for the calculations based on [8,34,35] or even over 10 degrees [36] in T g values of a polymer measured by different experimental techniques. These imply that the established SVR model can be used, in practice, to satisfactorily predict the T g of an unknown structurally similar polymer outside of the training set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the dynamic mechanical method is certainly one of the simpler forced non-resonance techniques to understand, but nevertheless to perform accurate measurements and to ensure the relevance of the collected experimental data, a lot of precautions have to be taken. Indeed, large discrepancies among data obtained in DMA by different apparatus or various analysis methods, or even different laboratories using identical instruments have been sometimes underlined by diverse authors [4][5]. These discrepancies are principally due to different well-identified factors:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways to identify the value of T g based on the dynamic mechanical measurements, such as the peak value of the loss tangent, the peak value of the loss modulus, and the onset of the drop of the storage modulus. However, one has to be aware of the fact that the obtained T g value depends on the method [5]. When the T g values determined using different definitions are compared, large differences are often underlined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%