2022
DOI: 10.1177/00315125221116609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dynamic Balance Performances of Adult Runners With Intellectual Disability Versus Their Sedentary Peers

Abstract: Our aim in this study was to compare the dynamic balance between runners (100 sprint) and non-runners with intellectual disability (ID). Our participants were 36 healthy male adults with ID aged 17–29 years, divided into runners ( n = 18) and sedentary non-runners ( n = 18). We assessed dynamic balance in these participants, using the Y-Balance Test (YBT), the Expanded-Timed Up and Go Test (ETUGT) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT). Runners with ID had significantly better balance scores than their sedentary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ETUGT is a functional assessment tool that evaluates mobility and dynamic balance in individuals with IDs [10,40]. This test was conducted by a trained examiner who timed the performance with a chronometer.…”
Section: Dynamic Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ETUGT is a functional assessment tool that evaluates mobility and dynamic balance in individuals with IDs [10,40]. This test was conducted by a trained examiner who timed the performance with a chronometer.…”
Section: Dynamic Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then sat back down. The test was performed three times and the best time was recorded for analysis [27].…”
Section: Dynamic Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, athletes with intellectual disability have been shown to have poor PB compared to those without intellectual disability (Dellavia et al, 2009). Despite the benefits of sports practice for these individuals (Jouira et al, 2021; Jouira et al, 2022; Pineda et al, 2023), it is also accompanied by an inherent risk for injury (Wheeler et al, 2012; White et al, 2018). Intellectual disability is illustrated by an intellectual quotient (IQ) below 70 (Boat et al, 2015) that classifies the severity degree into mild, moderate, severe or profound intellectual disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%