Inhaled Particles and Vapours 1967
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-1329-3.50025-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dust Retention in Specific Pathogen Free and Standard Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uptake of amosite dust deep into the lungs of normal and SPF rats has been shown to be three times greater than the uptake of chrysotile dust (Wagner and Skidmore, 1965;Morris et al, 1967) Differential deposition was only minimally involved, as the subsequent clearance rate of chrysotile was some three times faster than that ofamosite. Holt et al (1966) found no chrysotile and only few amphibole fibres in the lymph nodes of exposed guinea pigs, which suggests that clearance occurs mainly via the respiratory tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The uptake of amosite dust deep into the lungs of normal and SPF rats has been shown to be three times greater than the uptake of chrysotile dust (Wagner and Skidmore, 1965;Morris et al, 1967) Differential deposition was only minimally involved, as the subsequent clearance rate of chrysotile was some three times faster than that ofamosite. Holt et al (1966) found no chrysotile and only few amphibole fibres in the lymph nodes of exposed guinea pigs, which suggests that clearance occurs mainly via the respiratory tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A few rats had multiple malignant tumours: 2 of the rats with mesothelioma of the pleura also had a lung carcinoma and one rat with a squamous carcinoma The amount of chrysotile retained in the lungs did not show any clear increase with dose in rats exposed for longer than 3 months. In two earlier experiments (Wagner and Skidmore, 1965;Morris et al, 1967) a higher airborne dust concentration was used to give a cumulative dose in 6 weeks similar to that given in the present experiment over 3 months. The weight of asbestos found in the lungs of rats exposed to amphibole was 3 times greater than in those exposed to chrysotile.…”
Section: Asbestosismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This method was used in previous experiments (Morris et al, 1967). After exposure the rats were caged in threes or fours isolated in a special unit supplied with filtered air.…”
Section: Materials Ani) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results indicat,e that the dissolution of silica fl10m the amosite sample was faster than that from quartz at 37°C. Morris et al (8) observed that the eliminatiom. rates of amosite and silica from rat lung…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%