Comparison of Dorsal Dermal Fascial Fenestrations With Fasciotomy in an Acute Compartment Syndrome Model in the Foot

Abstract

Background: Treatment of compartment syndrome of the foot with fasciotomy remains controversial because of the theoretical risk of infection and soft tissue coverage issues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of compartment decompression with dorsal dermal fascial fenestration compared with fasciotomy in a cadaveric foot compartment syndrome model. We hypothesized that fasciotomies and dorsal dermal fenestrations would provide equivalent compartment decompression. Methods: Intracompartmental pressure was monitored in the first dorsal interosseous (FDIO), abductor (ABD), and superficial plantar (SP) compartments of 10 fresh frozen cadaveric limbs. A compartment syndrome model was created. Pressure measurements were obtained after dorsal dermal fascial fenestrations and after formal fasciotomies. Primary outcome variables were intracompartmental pressure in the FDIO, ABD, and SP compartments for 4 specific conditions: (1) baseline pressure, (2) pressure after compartment syndrome, (3) pressure after dermal fascial fenestrations, and (4) pressure after fasciotomies. Results: Fasciotomies decreased compartment pressures to within 10 mm Hg of baseline in all compartments ( P < .001). Compared with fasciotomies, dorsal dermal fascial fenestrations decreased the average pressure only in the FDIO compartment. Pressure decreases after fasciotomies compared with dorsal dermal fascial fenestrations were significantly greater ( P < .005). Conclusion: Fasciotomies were more effective than dorsal dermal fascial fenestrations at decreasing intracompartmental pressure. It seems that dermal fascial fenestrations were unable to provide effective decompression of the ABD and SP compartments of the foot and could provide only partial decompression of the dorsal compartments. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study indicate the need for caution in using fenestrations alone to treat acute compartment syndrome of the foot.

Acute Compartment Syndrome Modeling with Sequential Infusion Shows the Deep Posterior Compartment Is Not Functionally Discrete

“…This study represents a modification of previous models to reflect continuous pressure measurement, which is suggested to be superior in the literature 3,5,23-25 and is the only pressure measurement modality in the guideline published by the AAOS 22 . The model achieved pressures that were consistent with reported extremity infusion models of compartment pressures of 25 to 60 mm Hg 34-37 . The discrepancy between inline pressure measurements and compartment pressure measurements provides insight into modeling ACS and interpreting the results of older papers.…”

Controversies in the Treatment of Acute Compartment Syndrome of the Foot

“…Although several technique outcomes remain unclear, direct comparison of fasciotomy versus dorsal dermal fascial fenestrations in fresh frozen cadaveric model demonstrated that dermal fascial fenestrations decreased average ICP in the first dorsal interosseous compartment alone whereas fasciotomies decreased ICP to within 10 mm Hg of baseline in all measured compartments (first dorsal interosseous, abductor, and superficial plantar). 69…”

Treatment of bilateral Posterior Tibial Compartment Syndrome using a Novel Surgical Approach: A Case Report of the Posterior Approach

“…1,2 It can manifest in different anatomical locations, including the lower leg, 3,4 forearm, 5,6 thigh, 7 upper arm, 8 and foot. 9 Causes of osteofascial compartment syndrome can be divided into traumatic and non-traumatic factors. Traumatic causes include muscle tears or strains, blunt trauma, penetrating injuries, chemical injuries, electrical injuries, and crush injuries.…”