2015
DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2015.030305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dog's of the Dow Strategy

Abstract: Investors always try to find the ways to beat the market. In recent years, one popular strategy among International investors involves a portfolio comprising of the ten highest yielding stocks selected from among the KSE all share index stocks in the Karachi Stock Exchange-KSE, (one of the most popular stock indices of the Pakistan). Such portfolio based on the Dow Dividend Strategy (DDS) came to be known as the 'Dogs of the Dow.' Portfolio of 'Dogs of the Dow' has been found to outperform the Dow on numerous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no robust consensus on the validity of the theory in the market. Some have found the theory to be well confirmed (Chong & Luk, 2010;Tissayakorn et al, 2013;Soomro & Haroon, 2015;Yan et al, 2015), whereas other studies contradict the theory (Domian et al, 1998;Hirschey, 2000;Da Silva, 2001;Kim, 2019). Yan et al (2015) supported the validity of DoD theory by demonstrating higher returns upon following this strategy than the average market return in Taiwan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, there is no robust consensus on the validity of the theory in the market. Some have found the theory to be well confirmed (Chong & Luk, 2010;Tissayakorn et al, 2013;Soomro & Haroon, 2015;Yan et al, 2015), whereas other studies contradict the theory (Domian et al, 1998;Hirschey, 2000;Da Silva, 2001;Kim, 2019). Yan et al (2015) supported the validity of DoD theory by demonstrating higher returns upon following this strategy than the average market return in Taiwan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%