Gene Therapy - Developments and Future Perspectives 2011
DOI: 10.5772/18898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA Delivery and Expression Using Frequently Used Delivery Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results on muscle function reinforce the validity of this strategy since our model reproduces the pathological features of the disease with the major protein responsible for MFM: desmin. Moreover, compared to non-viral transfection techniques such as electroporation, this method significantly improves the percentage of transfected fibers [39,40], is easier to implement in vivo and does not induce the confounding effect of muscle damage frequently observed with electroporation. In the present study, we obtained a very homogeneous expression of the mutant desmin with more than 98% of the muscle fibers being transduced and expressing the transgene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results on muscle function reinforce the validity of this strategy since our model reproduces the pathological features of the disease with the major protein responsible for MFM: desmin. Moreover, compared to non-viral transfection techniques such as electroporation, this method significantly improves the percentage of transfected fibers [39,40], is easier to implement in vivo and does not induce the confounding effect of muscle damage frequently observed with electroporation. In the present study, we obtained a very homogeneous expression of the mutant desmin with more than 98% of the muscle fibers being transduced and expressing the transgene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfection efficiency is typically evaluated by analyzing the expression of a luminescent protein (i.e., firefly luciferase [62]), a fluorescent protein (i.e., GFP [159]), or other easily detectable proteins such as the β-galactosidase [137], or a combination thereof [160]. Depending on the transgene delivered, the read-out system allows direct detection of the cells expressing the protein of interest, as for fluorescent proteins, through flow cytometry (FCM) and imaging techniques, or indirectly [68,137].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Transfection Effectiveness: a Trade-off Betweementioning
confidence: 99%