2020
DOI: 10.1080/10520295.2020.1800091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA damage and proliferative capacities in smear samples of HPV positive and negative patients by micronucleus counting and AgNOR staining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that the number and size of NOR‐related proteins reflect RNA activity. It has been determined that NOR numbers reflect cell activity increase in malignant events 15,23 . The NORs of metaphase chromosomes are associated with a group of acidic proteins called the argyrophilic NOR region (AgNOR) proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have shown that the number and size of NOR‐related proteins reflect RNA activity. It has been determined that NOR numbers reflect cell activity increase in malignant events 15,23 . The NORs of metaphase chromosomes are associated with a group of acidic proteins called the argyrophilic NOR region (AgNOR) proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NORs of metaphase chromosomes are associated with a group of acidic proteins called the argyrophilic NOR region (AgNOR) proteins. When viewed with a light microscope, silver‐stained AgNOR areas appear as black dots that can be measured to quantify rRNA transcription activity 23 . The size and number of AgNOR correlate with the proliferation capacity of cells 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in these papers, the MN rates are much higher than that presented by the authors of this study. As striking examples, the rates of cervical cells with MN in the same population (Turkish women) is 8.2% (82‰; n = 11) 5 and 1.19‰ (n = 11) 6 in recent publications. The first result is also unusual, that is, very high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%