1993
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(93)85348-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of distillation with other current isolation methods for the determination of methyl mercury compounds in low level environmental samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
193
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
193
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike total-Hg concentrations, methyl-Hg concentrations in analyzed samples were determined using a method adapted from previous publications (Bloom 1989;Horvat et al 1993). Briefly, about 1 g of freeze-dried sediment was digested with a 25 % KOH/methanol solution and sample distillation method avoided to minimize the artificial methylation artifact reported by other researchers (Horvat et al 1993). Next, samples in loosely capped Teflon vials were placed in an oven at 45°C overnight.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike total-Hg concentrations, methyl-Hg concentrations in analyzed samples were determined using a method adapted from previous publications (Bloom 1989;Horvat et al 1993). Briefly, about 1 g of freeze-dried sediment was digested with a 25 % KOH/methanol solution and sample distillation method avoided to minimize the artificial methylation artifact reported by other researchers (Horvat et al 1993). Next, samples in loosely capped Teflon vials were placed in an oven at 45°C overnight.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors [11][12][13][14][15][21][22][23][24] cite the accidental MeHg formation as one of the main problems in determining this analite and consequently in the organic Hg determination. According to these authors, the % of Hg +2 methylated is low (up to 0.5%, but normally between 0.01 to 0.05% in relation to Hg +2 ).…”
Section: Inorganic Hgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection limit for the method is approximately 5 ng/g. Methylmercury was determined using a combination of two methods (Horvat et al 1993;Liang et al 1994). Methylmercury was determined by aqueous phase ethylation, cryogenic trapping, and chromatographic desorption followed by detection with cold vapor atomic fluorescence.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylmercury was determined by aqueous phase ethylation, cryogenic trapping, and chromatographic desorption followed by detection with cold vapor atomic fluorescence. Distillation was used to separate methylmercury from other interfering species as described by Horvat et al (1993).…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%